شیء ناشناس پرنده
شیءِ ناشناسِ پرنده، بشقاب پرنده یا یوفو (به انگلیسی: Unidentified flying object | UFO) اصطلاح رایج برای هر پدیدهٔ هوایی است که علت آن نمیتواند بهآسانی یا بلافاصله توسط ناظر شناخته شود. نیروی هوایی ایالات متحده آمریکا، که در سال ۱۹۵۲ این اصطلاح را ابداع کردهاست، در ابتدا اصطلاح «یوفو» را به اشیائی که پس از بررسی دقیق توسط محققان متخصص ناشناخته باقی میمانَد، اطلاق کرد؛ هر چند امروزه اصطلاح یوفو اغلب برای توصیف هر گونه منظرهٔ ناشناخته که توسط ناظر گزارش میشود، استفاده میشود.
فرهنگ عامه غالباً اصطلاح یوفو را بهعنوان یک مترادف برای فضاپیمای بیگانگان استفاده میکند. فرقهها با یوفوها همراه شده، و اسطورهشناسی و فرهنگ عامه پیرامون این پدیده تکامل یافتهاند. برخی از محققان در حال حاضر ترجیح میدهند برای جلوگیری از سردرگمی و باورهای نادرستی که بهدنبال اصطلاح یوفو میآید، از اصطلاح عامترِ «پدیدهٔ ناشناس هوایی»(به انگلیسی: UAP) استفاده کنند. یکی دیگر از مخففها برای یوفو، که بهطور گسترده در زبانهای اسپانیایی، فرانسوی، پرتغالی و ایتالیایی استفاده میشود، "OVNI" است. مطالعات نشان دادهاست که اکثر یوفوهای مشاهدهشده اجسام متداولی مانند هواپیما، بالون یا اجسام نجومی ازقبیل سنگهای آسمانی یا سیارات درخشان است. همچنین درصد کمی از گزارشهای مشاهدهٔ یوفوها جعلی است. تنها درصد کمی (بین ۵ تا ۲۰٪) از گزارشهای مبنی بر رؤیت یوفوها را میتوان بهطور مشخص در طبقهٔ «اشیای ناشناس پرنده» به مفهوم دقیق آن قرار داد.
بشقابپرنده یا یک اشتباه؟[نیازمند منبع][ویرایش]
فقط بررسی گزارشهای مشاهدهٔ بشقابپرنده توسط افراد مطلع و آشنا معتبر است، زیرا بسیاری از کسانی که مدعی مشاهدهٔ بشقابپرنده شدهاند، اشیاء یا پدیدههای شناختهشده را بهعنوان بشقابپرنده تلقی کردهاند. مشهورترین و آشناترینِ این اشیاء یا پدیدهها عبارتند از: موشکهای پرتابشده توسط هواپیما، ماهوارههای برخاسته از زمین، شهاب، قطعات شهابسنگ خردشده که با انعکاس نور خورشید روشن دیده میشوند، روشن شدن ابرهای ارتفاعپایین توسط خورشید، طبقات موشکهای حامل، نورهای به رنگهای مختلفِ حاصل از سوختن ماهوارهها در جو، گلولههای منور نظامی، هواپیماهایی که فرود آمدنشان را علامت میدهند، بالونهای آزمایش، کرههای درخشان یا قرصهای برّاق و روشن حاصل از انعکاس نور توسط سطوح خارجی هواپیماهای مدرن، دنبالهٔ بخار هواپیماها، سطح بالونهای آزمایشی و هر سطح صیقلدادهشده، حشراتی که در ارتفاعات خیلی بالا پرواز میکنند، پرندگان، هالهٔ نورانیِ اطراف خطوط سیمهای انتقال برق فشار قوی بر اثر احاطه شدن با کریستالهای یخ در زمستان، سیارات، ستارههای درخشان، نورافکن، اعلانات نورانی بدنهٔ هواپیما، امواج انعکاسیافتهٔ رادارهای دوربرد روی صفحهٔ رادار (بر اثر تغییرات محلیِ جو)، هواپیماهای بدون خلبان، سراب نوریِ جو، سراب الکترونیکیِ یونوسفری، کاغذ سفید سرگردان در هوا که بر اثر تابش نور خورشید درخشان دیده میشوند، حباب کف و غیره.
بشقابپرندهها در ایران[ویرایش]
در دورهٔ جدید که موج رؤیت بشقابپرندهها به اوج رسید، نام ایران نیز در بین کشورهایی قرار گرفت که نهتنها تعداد قابلتوجهی گزارش از آن مخابره میشد، بلکه تعدادی از گزارشهای مهم ازنظر طرفداران وجود بشقابپرندهها در ایران رخ دادهبود. در این بین، یکی از گزارشها اهمیت بیشتری داشت: شیء ناشناس پرنده که در بامداد روز ۱۹ سپتامبر سال ۱۹۷۶ (۲۸ شهریور ۱۳۵۵) در تهران دیده شد. بر اساس گزارشی از این ماجرا، که در ۳۱ اگوست ۱۹۷۷ (۱۳۵۶) منتشر شد، ساعت ۱۲:۳۰ نیمهشب ۱۹ سپتامبر تلفنهایی از منطقهٔ شمیرانات به نیروی هوایی ارتش ایران زده میشود و طی آن، گزارش رؤیت یک شیء پرندهٔ ناشناس در افق شمالی گزارش میشود. دقایقی بعد، برج مراقبت فرودگاه مهرآباد تهران حضور این جِرم را در رادار خود تأیید میکند و بلافاصله یک فروند هواپیمای شکاری به تعقیب آن برمیخیزد.
گزارشهای اخیر درمورد یوفو[ویرایش]
۲۵ و ۲۶ فروردینماه ۱۳۸۳ خبرگزاریها خبر مشاهده شیء ناشناس نورانی را در آسمان مشکینشهر و اردبیل دادند، بلافاصله صدا و سیما تصاویری که توسط یک دوربین آماتور(ساده) از این اجرام تهیه شده بود منتشر ساخت و بدین ترتیب موج جدید آغاز شد. خبرگزاری ایرنا در کمتر از ۷۲ ساعت بیش از ۶ خبر از رؤیت این اجرام در آسمان شهرهای مختلف ایران از مشکینشهر و اردبیل گرفته تا گنبدکاووس و تبریز و اراک و اشنویه و سنندج و… منتشر کرد.
گزارش اول از دو شیء پرندهٔ ناشناس در آسمان سخن میگفت که تلألوئی با رنگهای مختلف داشتند و حرکتهایی نامشخص در آسمان انجام میدادند هنوز دربارهٔ این گزارش نمیتوان اظهار نظر کرد، چرا که هیچ داده مشخصی از آن وجود ندارد. اما در بقیهٔ موارد با شیء درخشان در افق جنوب غرب یا شمال غرب مواجه شدیم که حتی از آن هم تصاویری تهیه و پخش شد. به غیر از گزارش اول که مانند رؤیت بسیاری از اجرام پرنده اطلاعات ناقص و نامشخصی دارد، برای بقیهٔ پاسخ قاطعی وجود دارد. چیزی که حتی باور آن نیز مشکل است که چطور چنین شمار زیادی از مردم و رسانهها به آن بیتوجه بودهاند.
گزارش ایرنا از دیده شدن این شیء در تبریز را مرور کنید[نیازمند منبع]:
آذر ۱۳۹۵ شیئ بزرگ از آسمان مازندران رد شد و به گفته شاهدان عینی بیسیم پلیس و آنتن تمام تلفنهای خانگی و تلفنهای همراه تا چند ساعت قطع بودند. اما صحت آن را تاکنون هیچ منبع رسمی اعلام نکرده.
برخی موارد گزارش اشیای پرنده ناشناخته[ویرایش]
اسناد علنی شده «پروژه کتاب آبی» نیروی هوایی آمریکا[ویرایش]
جان گرینوالد مورخ آماتور آمریکایی حدود دو دهه بهطور مستمر از دولت آمریکا خواستهاست تا اسناد طبقهبندی شده مربوط به اشیای ناشناس پرنده (بشقابپرندهها) را علنی کند. موارد زیر پنج نکته مهم از اسناد علنی شده نیروی هوایی آمریکاست که در دوران انجام این پژوهشها به «پروژه کتاب آبی» شهرت داشت.
۱- پروژه کتاب آبی یک مأموریتی با ابعاد قابل ملاحظه بود[ویرایش]
الخاندرو روخاس پژوهشگر بشقابپرندهها به بیبیسی گفت که سابقه این مأموریت به ژوئن ۱۹۴۷ برمیگردد. او که در حال حاضر سردبیر نشریهای است به نام «ذهن باز»، میافزاید که در آن زمان یک تاجر و خلبان مورد احترام به نام کنت آرنولد در زمان پرواز بر فراز ایالت واشینگتن اشیای پرنده ناشناس و غیرقابل تشخیصی را مشاهده کرده بود.
مدتی بعد کنت آرنولد در تشریح این اشیای ناشناس گفت که «مثل بشقابهای درحال دَوَران» حرکت میکردند. از آن زمان بهبعد رسانهها از واژهٔ بشقابپرنده استفاده کردند.
این حادثه به علاوه چند مورد خبرساز دیگر مثل گزارشهایی درمورد فرود آمدن یک شیء ناشناس پرنده در ایالت نیومکزیکو در همان سال، باعث شد که نیروی هوایی آمریکا نهاد ویژهای را مأمور تحقیقات در این زمینه کند. این مأموریت را «پروژه کتاب آبی» نامیدند و مرکز آن در پایگاه نیروی هوایی رایت - پاترسون در ایالت اوهایو مستقر شد.
در آغاز کار فقط چند نفر در این مأموریت مشغول به کار بودند. اما در طول دو دههای که فعالیت آن ادامه داشت این گروه بیش از ۱۲٬۶۰۰ مورد گزارش از رؤیت بشقابپرندهها را دریافت کرد و درمورد آنها تحقیقاتی انجام داد.
۲- پروژهٔ کتاب آبی در سالهای هراس عمومی در آمریکا راهاندازی شد[ویرایش]
هدف از راهاندازی این پروژهٔ تحقیقاتی که درست در سالهای آغاز جنگ سرد شروع به کار کرد، کاستن از هراس مردم آمریکا بود که از پخش شایعات مربوط به مشاهدهٔ اشیای ناشناس پرنده در نقاط حساس کشور، مثل آسمان شهر واشینگتن یا بر فراز کاخ سفید، بهشدت نگران شدهبودند.
جان گرینوالد، مورخ آماتور آمریکایی، که بخشی از اسناد پروژهٔ کتاب آبی را منتشر کرده، میگوید: «در آن زمان هراس شدیدی در میان مردم آمریکا وجود داشت و از نظر حکومت و نیروهای مسلح وجود چنین هراسی در میان مردم یک خطر بزرگ تلقی میشد. این مهم نبود که آیا چنین اشیایی وجود دارند یا نه، و اگر وجود دارند آیا واقعاً متعلق به موجودات فضایی هستند. مسئله اصلی این بود که این شایعات هراس شدیدی را به وجود آورده بود و حکومت باید این نگرانیها را کنترل و آرام میکرد.»
هر چند امروزه دیگر کمتر کسی موضوع بشقابپرندهها را جدی میگیرد ولی اسناد نشان میدهند که در دهههای چهل و پنجاه میلادی این موضوع یکی از موارد مهم از مباحث و برنامهریزیها در سطوح عالی حکومت آمریکا بودهاست.
الخاندرو روخاس، پژوهشگر بشقابپرندهها، میگوید: «در آن زمان این موضوع بسیار جدی تلقی میشد و حتی مدیران سازمان سیا در صحبتهای علنی خود میگفتند که این یک موضوع واقعی است و برخی از اعضای کنگرهٔ آمریکا از جمله جرالد فورد که بعدها به مقام ریاست جمهوری رسید، تأکید میکردند که در این مورد باید تحقیقات جدی صورت بگیرد.»
در سال ۱۹۶۶ یک هیئت تحقیق دیگر توسط نیروی هوایی آمریکا تشکیل شد تا درمورد برخی از موارد موجود در مأموریت پروژه کتاب آبی تحقیقات عمیقتری انجام دهد. این هیئت تحقیق بعدها گزارشی تهیه کرد و در آن قید کرد که هیچ شواهدی درمورد وجود بشقابپرندهها به دست نیاوردهاست. پروژهٔ کتاب آبی بالاخره در سال ۱۹۶۹ تعطیل شد.
۳- همچنین به نظر میرسد که بسیاری از موارد در پروژهٔ کتاب آبی بارها مورد پژوهش قرار گرفته سپس رد شدهاند.[ویرایش]
هرچند در برخی از موارد، منابع قابلاعتمادی مثل دریادارهای نیروی دریایی آمریکا یا خلبانهای ارتش و خطوط هوایی مشاهده بشقابپرندهها را گزارش دادهبودند، اما نتیجهٔ اکثر مواردی که در پروژه کتاب آبی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند این بود که دلیل چنین مشاهداتی خطای دید ناشی از تغییرات ناگهانی جوی، اشتباه گرفتن بالونهای هواشناسی با اشیای ناشناس یا خطای دید ناشی از انعکاس نور بر فراز محیط آغشته به گاز در باتلاقها بودهاست.
بهعنوان نمونه، در آوریل ۱۹۵۶، در شهر سیاتل، واشینگتن چند شاهد ادعا کردند "یک شیء مدور و سفید بهاندازهٔ یک برابر و نیم ماه را دیدهاند که مرتب در آسمان دور میزد. در میان اسناد پروژهٔ کتاب آبی میتوان دید که پژوهشگران به این نتیجه رسیدهاند که این شیء یک بالون مخصوص هواشناسی بوده و به این خاطر پروندهٔ تحقیق در این مورد را بستند.
و یا در ژانویه ۱۹۶۱ در ایالت نیوجرسی یک شاهد گزارش داد که یک شئ خاکستری رنگ و تیره را دیدهاست «که به اندازه یک هواپیمای جت بوده ولی بال نداشته». بعدها تحقیقات نشان داد که این شئ در حقیقت یک هواپیمای جت بوده که در منطقه پرواز میکردهاست.
۴- برخی از موارد در پروژهٔ کتاب آبی را نمیتوان بهسادگی توضیح داد[ویرایش]
به گفته جان گرینوالد و الخاندرو روخاس در نهایت پژوهشگران نتوانستند برای ۷۰۰ مورد از پروندههای موجود در پروژه کتاب آبی توجیه قانعکنندهای پیدا کنند. برای حل بسیاری از این موارد شواهد و اطلاعات کافی وجود نداشت.
اما برخی از این پروندههای بستهشده هنوز هم برای پژوهشگران بشقابپرندهها سؤالبرانگیز هستند.
در یکی از این موارد، یک مأمور پلیس در سال ۱۹۶۴ درحالیکه یک اتومبیل مظنون را تعقیب میکرد یک شئ عجیب و ناشناس را در آسمان دید. این مأمور پلیس شئ پرنده را تعقیب کرده و میگوید با چشم خودش دیدهاست که این شئ در نقطهای فرود آمد و دو موجود که قامت آنها به اندازه یک کودک بود، از آن خارج شدند. این شئ پرنده بعد از مدتی به پرواز درمی آید و منطقه را ترک میکند اما از فرود آن بر سطح زمین آثاری به جا میمانَد.
جان گرینوالد، مورخ آماتور بشقابپرندهها، میگوید: «پروژهٔ کتاب آبی این مورد را غیرقابلتوضیح طبقهبندی کرده و پس از گذشت چندین دهه هنوز نمیتوانند برای آن پاسخی بیابند.»
۵- هنوز هم درمورد یوفوها اطلاعات انتشار نیافته وجود دارد[ویرایش]
هرچند جان گرینوالد تاکنون توانستهاست حدود صد هزار صفحه از اسناد دولتی درمورد بشقابپرندهها را جمعآوری و منتشر کند ولی تأکید میکند که هنوز هم اطلاعات بسیار زیادی در این زمینه وجود دارد که افکار عمومی و مردم از آن بیخبرند.
او در تازهترین مورد از تقاضاهای مکرر خود از نهادهای اطلاعاتی آمریکا توانستهاست صدها صفحه مدارک دیگر را به دست بیاورد؛ ولی به گفته او این اسناد چنان سانسور شدهاند که در هر صفحهٔ آن فقط چند کلمهٔ خوانا وجود دارد!.
جان گرینوالد یادآوری میکند که به غیر از نیروی هوایی و پروژهٔ کتاب آبی، نهادهای اطلاعاتی دیگر آمریکا مثل سازمان سیا و اداره امنیت وزارت دفاع نیز درمورد بشقابپرندهها تحقیقاتی انجام دادهاند که هیچیک از آنها تاکنون علنی نشدهاند.
او میافزاید: «به نظر من پروژهٔ کتاب آبی فقط بخش کوچک و شناخته شده این تحقیقات است و من به تقاضاهای مکرر خود برای انتشار سایر اسناد ادامه خواهم داد. همیشه بعد از هر مورد از رسوا*ییهای مربوط به مخفی کاری نهادهای دولتی اطلاعات جدیدی درز میکند و من مطمئن هستم که اطلاعات بیشتری وجود دارد که باید به دنبال آن رفت.»
پیوند به بیرون[ویرایش]
در پروژههای خواهر میتوانید در مورد UFO اطلاعات بیشتری بیابید.
در میان کتابها از ویکیکتاب
در میان گفتاوردها از ویکیگفتاورد
در میان متون از ویکینبشته
در میان تصویرها و رسانهها از ویکیانبار
در میان خبرها از ویکیخبر
An unidentified flying object (UFO) is an object observed in the sky that is not readily identified. Most UFOs are later identified as conventional objects or phenomena. The term is widely used for claimed observations of extraterrestrial spacecraft.
The term "UFO" (or "UFOB") was coined in 1953 by the United States Air Force (USAF) to serve as a catch-all for all such reports. In its initial definition, the USAF stated that a "UFOB" was "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." Accordingly, the term was initially restricted to that fraction of cases which remained unidentified after investigation, as the USAF was interested in potential national security reasons and/or "technical aspects" (see Air Force Regulation 200-2).
During the late 1940s and through the 1950s, UFOs were often referred to popularly as "flying saucers" or "flying discs". The term UFO became more widespread during the 1950s, at first in technical literature, but later in popular use. UFOs garnered considerable interest during the Cold War, an era associated with a heightened concern for national security, and, more recently, in the 2010s, for unexplained reasons. Nevertheless, various studies have concluded that the phenomenon does not represent a threat to national security, nor does it contain anything worthy of scientific pursuit (e.g., 1951 Flying Saucer Working Party, 1953 CIA Robertson Panel, USAF Project Blue Book, Condon Committee).
The acronym "UFO" was coined by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, who headed Project Blue Book, then the USAF's official investigation of UFOs. He wrote, "Obviously the term 'flying saucer' is misleading when applied to objects of every conceivable shape and performance. For this reason the military prefers the more general, if less colorful, name: unidentified flying objects. UFO (pronounced Yoo-foe) for short." Other phrases that were used officially and that predate the UFO acronym include "flying flapjack", "flying disc", "unexplained flying discs", and "unidentifiable object".
The phrase "flying saucer" had gained widespread attention after the summer of 1947. On June 24, a civilian pilot named Kenneth Arnold reported seeing nine objects flying in formation near Mount Rainier. Arnold timed the sighting and estimated the speed of discs to be over 1,200 mph (1,931 km/h). At the time, he claimed he described the objects flying in a saucer-like fashion, leading to newspaper accounts of "flying saucers" and "flying discs".
In popular usage, the term UFO came to be used to refer to claims of alien spacecraft. and because of the public and media ridicule associated with the topic, some ufologists and investigators prefer to use terms such as "unidentified aerial phenomenon" (UAP) or "anomalous phenomena", as in the title of the National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP). "Anomalous aerial vehicle" (AAV) or "unidentified aerial system" (UAS) are also sometimes used in a military aviation context to describe unidentified targets.
Studies have established that the majority of UFO observations are misidentified conventional objects or natural phenomena—most commonly aircraft, balloons, noctilucent clouds, nacreous clouds, or astronomical objects such as meteors or bright planets with a small percentage even being hoaxes.[note 1] Between 5% and 20% of reported sightings are not explained, and therefore can be classified as unidentified in the strictest sense. While proponents of the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) suggest that these unexplained reports are of alien spacecraft, the null hypothesis cannot be excluded that these reports are simply other more prosaic phenomena that cannot be identified due to lack of complete information or due to the necessary subjectivity of the reports.
Almost no scientific papers about UFOs have been published in peer-reviewed journals. There was, in the past, some debate in the scientific community about whether any scientific investigation into UFO sightings is warranted with the general conclusion being that the phenomenon was not worthy of serious investigation except as a cultural artifact. UFOs have been the subject of investigations by various governments who have provided extensive records related to the subject. Many of the most involved government-sponsored investigations ended after agencies concluded that there was no benefit to continued investigation.
The void left by the lack of institutional or scientific study has given rise to independent researchers and fringe groups, including the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) in the mid-20th century and, more recently, the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) and the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). The term "Ufology" is used to describe the collective efforts of those who study reports and associated evidence of unidentified flying objects.
Unexplained aerial observations have been reported throughout history. Some were undoubtedly astronomical in nature: comets, bright meteors, one or more of the five planets that can be readily seen with the naked eye, planetary conjunctions, or atmospheric optical phenomena such as parhelia and lenticular clouds. An example is Halley's Comet, which was recorded first by Chinese astronomers in 240 BC and possibly as early as 467 BC. Such sightings throughout history often were treated as supernatural portents, angels, or other religious omens. Some current-day UFO researchers have noticed similarities between some religious symbols in medieval paintings and UFO reports though the canonical and symbolic character of such images is documented by art historians placing more conventional religious interpretations on such images.
UFOs have been subject to investigations over the years that varied widely in scope and scientific rigor. Governments or independent academics in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, Peru, France, Belgium, Sweden, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay, Mexico, Spain, and the Soviet Union are known to have investigated UFO reports at various times.
Among the best known government studies are the ghost rockets investigation by the Swedish military (1946–1947), Project Blue Book, previously Project Sign and Project Grudge, conducted by the USAF from 1947 until 1969, the secret U.S. Army/Air Force Project Twinkle investigation into green fireballs (1948–1951), the secret USAF Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 by the Battelle Memorial Institute, and the Brazilian Air Force's 1977 Operação Prato (Operation Saucer). France has had an ongoing investigation (GEPAN/SEPRA/GEIPAN) within its space agency Centre national d'études spatiales (CNES) since 1977; the government of Uruguay has had a similar investigation since 1989.
Project Sign in 1948 produced a highly classified finding (see Estimate of the Situation) that the best UFO reports probably had an extraterrestrial explanation. A top secret Swedish military opinion given to the USAF in 1948 stated that some of their analysts believed that the 1946 ghost rockets and later flying saucers had extraterrestrial origins. (For document, see Ghost rockets.) In 1954 German rocket scientist Hermann Oberth revealed that an internal West German government investigation, which he headed, had arrived at an extraterrestrial conclusion, but this study was never made public.
Project Sign was dismantled and became Project Grudge at the end of 1948. Angered by the low quality of investigations by Grudge, the Air Force Director of Intelligence reorganized it as Project Blue Book in late 1951, placing Ruppelt in charge. Blue Book closed down in 1970, using the Condon Committee's negative conclusion as a rationale, thus ending official Air Force UFO investigations. However, a 1969 USAF document, known as the Bolender memo, along with later government documents, revealed that non-public U.S. government UFO investigations continued after 1970. The Bolender memo first stated that "reports of unidentified flying objects that could affect national security ... are not part of the Blue Book system," indicating that more serious UFO incidents already were handled outside the public Blue Book investigation. The memo then added, "reports of UFOs which could affect national security would continue to be handled through the standard Air Force procedures designed for this purpose."[note 2] In addition, in the late 1960s a chapter on UFOs in the Space Sciences course at the U.S. Air Force Academy gave serious consideration to possible extraterrestrial origins. When word of the curriculum became public, the Air Force in 1970 issued a statement to the effect that the book was outdated and that cadets instead were being informed of the Condon Report's negative conclusion.
USAF Regulation 200-2
Air Force Regulation 200-2, issued in 1953 and 1954, defined an Unidentified Flying Object ("UFOB") as "any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object." The regulation also said UFOBs were to be investigated as a "possible threat to the security of the United States" and "to determine technical aspects involved." The regulation went on to say that "it is permissible to inform news media representatives on UFOB's when the object is positively identified as a familiar object," but added: "For those objects which are not explainable, only the fact that ATIC [Air Technical Intelligence Center] will analyze the data is worthy of release, due to many unknowns involved."
Project Blue Book
J. Allen Hynek, a trained astronomer who served as a scientific advisor for Project Blue Book, was initially skeptical of UFO reports, but eventually came to the conclusion that many of them could not be satisfactorily explained and was highly critical of what he described as "the cavalier disregard by Project Blue Book of the principles of scientific investigation." Leaving government work, he founded the privately funded CUFOS, to whose work he devoted the rest of his life. Other private groups studying the phenomenon include the MUFON, a grass roots organization whose investigator's handbooks go into great detail on the documentation of alleged UFO sightings.
Like Hynek, Jacques Vallée, a scientist and prominent UFO researcher, has pointed to what he believes is the scientific deficiency of most UFO research, including government studies. He complains of the mythology and cultism often associated with the phenomenon, but alleges that several hundred professional scientists—a group both he and Hynek have termed "the invisible college"—continue to study UFOs in private.
The study of UFOs has received little support in mainstream scientific literature. Official studies ended in the U.S. in December 1969, following the statement by the government scientist Edward Condon that further study of UFOs could not be justified on grounds of scientific advancement. The Condon Report and its conclusions were endorsed by the National Academy of Scientists, of which Condon was a member. On the other hand, a scientific review by the UFO subcommittee of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) disagreed with Condon's conclusion, noting that at least 30 percent of the cases studied remained unexplained and that scientific benefit might be gained by continued study.
Critics argue that all UFO evidence is anecdotal and can be explained as prosaic natural phenomena. Defenders of UFO research counter that knowledge of observational data, other than what is reported in the popular media, is limited in the scientific community and that further study is needed.
No official government investigation has ever publicly concluded that UFOs are indisputably real, physical objects, extraterrestrial in origin, or of concern to national defense. These same negative conclusions also have been found in studies that were highly classified for many years, such as the UK's Flying Saucer Working Party, Project Condign, the U.S. CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel, the U.S. military investigation into the green fireballs from 1948 to 1951, and the Battelle Memorial Institute study for the USAF from 1952 to 1955 (Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14).
Some public government reports have acknowledged the possibility of physical reality of UFOs, but have stopped short of proposing extraterrestrial origins, though not dismissing the possibility entirely. Examples are the Belgian military investigation into large triangles over their airspace in 1989–1991 and the 2009 Uruguayan Air Force study conclusion (see below).
Some private studies have been neutral in their conclusions, but argued that the inexplicable core cases call for continued scientific study. Examples are the Sturrock panel study of 1998 and the 1970 AIAA review of the Condon Report.
U.S. investigations into UFOs include:
Thousands of documents released under FOIA also indicate that many U.S. intelligence agencies collected (and still collect) information on UFOs. These agencies include the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), FBI, CIA, National Security Agency (NSA), as well as military intelligence agencies of the Army and U.S. Navy, in addition to the Air Force.[note 3]
The investigation of UFOs has also attracted many civilians, who in the U.S formed research groups such as NICAP (active 1956–1980), Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO) (active 1952–1988), MUFON (active 1969–), and CUFOS (active 1973–).
In November 2011, the White House released an official response to two petitions asking the U.S. government to acknowledge formally that aliens have visited this planet and to disclose any intentional withholding of government interactions with extraterrestrial beings. According to the response, "The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race." Also, according to the response, there is "no credible information to suggest that any evidence is being hidden from the public's eye." The response further noted that efforts, like SETI and NASA's Kepler space telescope and Mars Science Laboratory, continue looking for signs of life. The response noted "odds are pretty high" that there may be life on other planets but "the odds of us making contact with any of them—especially any intelligent ones—are extremely small, given the distances involved."
Following the large U.S. surge in sightings in June and early July 1947, on July 9, 1947, United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) intelligence, in cooperation with the FBI, began a formal investigation into selected sightings with characteristics that could not be immediately rationalized, such as Kenneth Arnold's. The USAAF used "all of its top scientists" to determine whether "such a phenomenon could, in fact, occur." The research was "being conducted with the thought that the flying objects might be a celestial phenomenon," or that "they might be a foreign body mechanically devised and controlled." Three weeks later in a preliminary defense estimate, the air force investigation decided that, "This 'flying saucer' situation is not all imaginary or seeing too much in some natural phenomenon. Something is really flying around."
A further review by the intelligence and technical divisions of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field reached the same conclusion. It reported that "the phenomenon is something real and not visionary or fictitious," that there were objects in the shape of a disc, metallic in appearance, and as big as man-made aircraft. They were characterized by "extreme rates of climb [and] maneuverability," general lack of noise, absence of trail, occasional formation flying, and "evasive" behavior "when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft and radar," suggesting a controlled craft. It was therefore recommended in late September 1947 that an official Air Force investigation be set up to investigate the phenomenon. It was also recommended that other government agencies should assist in the investigation.[note 4]
This led to the creation of the Air Force's Project Sign at the end of 1947, one of the earliest government studies to come to a secret extraterrestrial conclusion. In August 1948, Sign investigators wrote a top-secret intelligence estimate to that effect, but the Air Force Chief of Staff Hoyt Vandenberg ordered it destroyed. The existence of this suppressed report was revealed by several insiders who had read it, such as astronomer and USAF consultant J. Allen Hynek and Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt, the first head of the USAF's Project Blue Book.
Another highly classified U.S. study was conducted by the CIA's Office of Scientific Investigation (OS/I) in the latter half of 1952 in response to orders from the National Security Council (NSC). This study concluded UFOs were real physical objects of potential threat to national security. One OS/I memo to the CIA Director (DCI) in December read:
The matter was considered so urgent that OS/I drafted a memorandum from the DCI to the NSC proposing that the NSC establish an investigation of UFOs as a priority project throughout the intelligence and the defense research and development community. It also urged the DCI to establish an external research project of top-level scientists, now known as the Robertson Panel to analyze the problem of UFOs. The OS/I investigation was called off after the Robertson Panel's negative conclusions in January 1953.
A public research effort conducted by the Condon Committee for the USAF, which arrived at a negative conclusion in 1968, marked the end of the U.S. government's official investigation of UFOs, though various government intelligence agencies continue unofficially to investigate or monitor the situation.[note 5]
Controversy has surrounded the Condon Report, both before and after it was released. It has been observed that the report was "harshly criticized by numerous scientists, particularly at the powerful AIAA ... [which] recommended moderate, but continuous scientific work on UFOs." In an address to the AAAS, James E. McDonald stated that he believed science had failed to mount adequate studies of the problem and criticized the Condon Report and earlier studies by the USAF as scientifically deficient. He also questioned the basis for Condon's conclusions and argued that the reports of UFOs have been "laughed out of scientific court." J. Allen Hynek, an astronomer who worked as a USAF consultant from 1948, sharply criticized the Condon Committee Report and later wrote two nontechnical books that set forth the case for continuing to investigate UFO reports.
Ruppelt recounted his experiences with Project Blue Book, a USAF investigation that preceded Condon's.
On October 31, 2008, the National Archives of Brazil began receiving from the Aeronautical Documentation and History Center part of the documentation of the Brazilian Air Force regarding the investigation of the appearance of UFOs in Brazil. Currently this collection gathers cases between 1952 and 2016.
In Canada, the Department of National Defence has dealt with reports, sightings and investigations of UFOs across Canada. In addition to conducting investigations into crop circles in Duhamel, Alberta, it still considers "unsolved" the Falcon Lake incident in Manitoba and the Shag Harbour UFO incident in Nova Scotia.
On March 2007, the French space agency CNES published an archive of UFO sightings and other phenomena online.
French studies include GEPAN/SEPRA/GEIPAN (1977–), within CNES (French space agency), the longest ongoing government-sponsored investigation. About 22% of 6000 cases studied remain unexplained. The official opinion of GEPAN/SEPRA/GEIPAN has been neutral, stating on their FAQ page that their mission is fact-finding for the scientific community, not rendering an opinion. They add they can neither prove nor disprove the Exterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH), but their Steering Committee's clear position is that they cannot discard the possibility that some fraction of the very strange 22% of unexplained cases might be due to distant and advanced civilizations. Possibly their bias may be indicated by their use of the terms "PAN" (French) or "UAP" (English equivalent) for "Unidentified Aerospace Phenomenon" (whereas "UAP" as normally used by English organizations stands for "Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon", a more neutral term). In addition, the three heads of the studies have gone on record in stating that UFOs were real physical flying machines beyond our knowledge or that the best explanation for the most inexplicable cases was an extraterrestrial one.
In 2008, Michel Scheller, president of the Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France (3AF), created the Sigma Commission. Its purpose was to investigate UFO phenomenon worldwide. A progress report published in May 2010 stated that the central hypothesis proposed by the COMETA report is perfectly credible. In December 2012, the final report of the Sigma Commission was submitted to Scheller. Following the submission of the final report, the Sigma2 Commission is to be formed with a mandate to continue the scientific investigation of UFO phenomenon.
According to some Italian ufologists, the first documented case of a UFO sighting in Italy dates back to April 11, 1933, to Varese. Documents of the time show that an alleged UFO crashed or landed near Vergiate. Following this, Benito Mussolini created a secret group to look at it, called Cabinet RS/33.
Alleged UFO sightings gradually increased since the war, peaking in 1978 and 2005. The total number of sightings since 1947 are 18,500, of which 90% are identifiable.
In 2000, Italian ufologist Roberto Pinotti published material regarding the so-called "Fascist UFO Files", which dealt with a flying saucer that had crashed near Milan in 1933 (some 14 years before the Roswell, New Mexico, crash), and of the subsequent investigation by a never mentioned before Cabinet RS/33, that allegedly was authorized by Benito Mussolini, and headed by the Nobel scientist Guglielmo Marconi. A spaceship was allegedly stored in the hangars of the SIAI Marchetti in Vergiate near Milan.
Julius Obsequens was a Roman writer who is believed to have lived in the middle of the fourth century AD. The only work associated with his name is the Liber de prodigiis (Book of Prodigies), completely extracted from an epitome, or abridgment, written by Livy; De prodigiis was constructed as an account of the wonders and portents that occurred in Rome between 249 BC-12 BC. An aspect of Obsequens' work that has inspired much interest in some circles is that references are made to things moving through the sky. These have been interpreted as reports of UFOs, but may just as well describe meteors, and, since Obsequens, probably, writes in the 4th century, that is, some 400 years after the events he describes, they hardly qualify as eye-witness accounts.
The UK's Flying Saucer Working Party published its final report in June 1951, which remained secret for over 50 years. The Working Party concluded that all UFO sightings could be explained as misidentifications of ordinary objects or phenomena, optical illusions, psychological misperceptions/aberrations, or hoaxes. The report stated: "We accordingly recommend very strongly that no further investigation of reported mysterious aerial phenomena be undertaken, unless and until some material evidence becomes available."
Eight file collections on UFO sightings, dating from 1978 to 1987, were first released on May 14, 2008, to The National Archives by the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Although kept secret from the public for many years, most of the files have low levels of classification and none are classified Top Secret. 200 files are set to be made public by 2012. The files are correspondence from the public sent to the British government and officials, such as the MoD and Margaret Thatcher. The MoD released the files under the Freedom of Information Act due to requests from researchers. These files include, but are not limited to, UFOs over Liverpool and the Waterloo Bridge in London.
On October 20, 2008, more UFO files were released. One case released detailed that in 1991 an Alitalia passenger aircraft was approaching London Heathrow Airport when the pilots saw what they described as a "cruise missile" fly extremely close to the cockpit. The pilots believed that a collision was imminent. UFO expert David Clarke says that this is one of the most convincing cases for a UFO he has come across.
A secret study of UFOs was undertaken for the Ministry of Defence between 1996 and 2000 and was code-named Project Condign. The resulting report, titled "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Defence Region", was publicly released in 2006, but the identity and credentials of whomever constituted Project Condign remains classified. The report confirmed earlier findings that the main causes of UFO sightings are misidentification of man-made and natural objects. The report noted: "No artefacts of unknown or unexplained origin have been reported or handed to the UK authorities, despite thousands of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena reports. There are no SIGINT, ELINT or radiation measurements and little useful video or still IMINT." It concluded: "There is no evidence that any UAP, seen in the UKADR [UK Air Defence Region], are incursions by air-objects of any intelligent (extraterrestrial or foreign) origin, or that they represent any hostile intent." A little-discussed conclusion of the report was that novel meteorological plasma phenomenon akin to ball lightning are responsible for "the majority, if not all" of otherwise inexplicable sightings, especially reports of black triangle UFOs.
On December 1, 2009, the Ministry of Defence quietly closed down its UFO investigations unit. The unit's hotline and email address were suspended by the MoD on that date. The MoD said there was no value in continuing to receive and investigate sightings in a release, stating
The Guardian reported that the MoD claimed the closure would save the Ministry around £50,000 a year. The MoD said that it would continue to release UFO files to the public through The National Archives.
According to records released on August 5, 2010, British wartime prime minister Winston Churchill banned the reporting for 50 years of an alleged UFO incident because of fears it could create mass panic. Reports given to Churchill asserted that the incident involved a Royal Air Force (RAF) reconnaissance aircraft returning from a mission in France or Germany toward the end of World War II. It was over or near the English coastline when it was allegedly intercepted by a strange metallic object that matched the aircraft's course and speed for a time before accelerating away and disappearing. The aircraft's crew were reported to have photographed the object, which they said had "hovered noiselessly" near the aircraft, before moving off. According to the documents, details of the coverup emerged when a man wrote to the government in 1999 seeking to find out more about the incident and described how his grandfather, who had served with the RAF in the war, was present when Churchill and U.S. General Dwight D. Eisenhower discussed how to deal with the UFO encounter. The files come from more than 5,000 pages of UFO reports, letters and drawings from members of the public, as well as questions raised in Parliament. They are available to download from The National Archives website.
In the April 1957 West Freugh incident in Scotland, named after the principal military base involved, two unidentified objects flying high over the UK were tracked by radar operators. The objects were reported to operate at speeds and perform maneuvers beyond the capability of any known craft. Also significant is their alleged size, which – based on the radar returns – was closer to that of a ship than an aircraft.
In the Rendlesham Forest incident of December 1980, U.S. military personnel witnessed UFOs near the air base at Woodbridge, Suffolk, over a period of three nights. On one night the deputy base commander, Colonel Charles I. Halt, and other personnel followed one or more UFOs that were moving in and above the forest for several hours. Col. Halt made an audio recording while this was happening and subsequently wrote an official memorandum summarizing the incident. After retirement from the military, he said that he had deliberately downplayed the event (officially termed 'Unexplained Lights') to avoid damaging his career. Other base personnel are said to have observed one of the UFOs, which had landed in the forest, and even gone up to and touched it.
The USAF's Project Blue Book files indicate that approximately 1% of all unknown reports came from amateur and professional astronomers or other users of telescopes (such as missile trackers or surveyors). In 1952, astronomer J. Allen Hynek, then a consultant to Blue Book, conducted a small survey of 45 fellow professional astronomers. Five reported UFO sightings (about 11%). In the 1970s, astrophysicist Peter A. Sturrock conducted two large surveys of the AIAA and American Astronomical Society (AAS). About 5% of the members polled indicated that they had had UFO sightings.
Astronomer Clyde Tombaugh, who admitted to six UFO sightings, including three green fireballs, supported the Extraterrestrial hypothesis for UFOs and stated he thought scientists who dismissed it without study were being "unscientific." Another astronomer was Lincoln LaPaz, who had headed the Air Force's investigation into the green fireballs and other UFO phenomena in New Mexico. LaPaz reported two personal sightings, one of a green fireball, the other of an anomalous disc-like object. (Both Tombaugh and LaPaz were part of Hynek's 1952 survey.) Hynek himself took two photos through the window of a commercial airliner of a disc-like object that seemed to pace his aircraft.
In 1980, a survey of 1800 members of various amateur astronomer associations by Gert Helb and Hynek for CUFOS found that 24% responded "yes" to the question "Have you ever observed an object which resisted your most exhaustive efforts at identification?"
Claims of increase in reports
MUFON reports that UFO sightings to their offices have increased by 67% in the previous three years as of 2011. According to MUFON international director Clifford Clift in 2011, "Over the past year, we've been averaging 500 sighting reports a month, compared to about 300 three years ago [67 percent],".
In 2013 the Peruvian government's Departamento de Investigación de Fenómenos Aéreos Anómalos (Anomalous Aerial Phenomena Research Department), or "DIFAA", was officially reactivated due to an increase in reported sightings. According to Colonel Julio Vucetich, head of the air force's aerospace interests division who himself claims to have seen an "anomalous aerial object", "On a personal basis, it's evident to me that we are not alone in this world or universe."
In contrast, according to the UK-based Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena (ASSAP), reports of sightings in Britain to their office have declined by 96% since 1988.
Identification of UFOs
Studies show that after careful investigation, the majority of UFOs can be identified as ordinary objects or phenomena. The most commonly found identified sources of UFO reports are:
A 1952–1955 study by the Battelle Memorial Institute for the USAF included these categories as well as a "psychological" one.
An individual 1979 study by CUFOS researcher Allan Hendry found, as did other investigations, that only a small percentage of cases he investigated were hoaxes (<1 %) and that most sightings were actually honest misidentifications of prosaic phenomena. Hendry attributed most of these to inexperience or misperception.
Claims by military, government, and aviation personnel
Since 2001 there have been calls for greater openness on the part of the government by various persons. In May 2001, a press conference was held at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., by an organization called the Disclosure Project, featuring twenty persons including retired Air Force and FAA personnel, intelligence officers and an air traffic controller. They all gave a brief account of what they knew or had witnessed, and stated that they would be willing to testify to what they had said under oath to a Congressional committee. According to a 2002 report in the Oregon Daily Emerald, Disclosure Project founder Steven M. Greer has gathered 120 hours of testimony from various government officials on the topic of UFOs, including astronaut Gordon Cooper and a Brigadier General.
In 2007, former Arizona governor Fife Symington came forward and belatedly claimed that he had seen "a massive, delta-shaped craft silently navigate over Squaw Peak, a mountain range in Phoenix, Arizona" in 1997.
On September 27, 2010, a group of six former USAF officers and one former enlisted Air Force man held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on the theme "U.S. Nuclear Weapons Have Been Compromised by Unidentified Aerial Objects." They told how they had witnessed UFOs hovering near missile sites and even disarming the missiles.
From April 29 to May 3, 2013, the Paradigm Research Group held the "Citizen Hearing on Disclosure" at the National Press Club. The group paid former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel and former Representatives Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, Roscoe Bartlett, Merrill Cook, Darlene Hooley, and Lynn Woolsey $20,000 each to hear testimony from a panel of researchers which included witnesses from military, agency, and political backgrounds.
Apollo 14 astronaut Dr Edgar Mitchell claimed that he knew of senior government employees who had been involved in "close encounters" and because of this he has no doubt that aliens have visited Earth.
While technically a UFO refers to any unidentified flying object, in modern popular culture the term UFO has generally become synonymous with alien spacecraft; however, the term ETV (ExtraTerrestrial Vehicle) is sometimes used to separate this explanation of UFOs from totally earthbound explanations.
Besides anecdotal visual sightings, reports sometimes include claims of other kinds of evidence, including cases studied by the military and various government agencies of different countries (such as Project Blue Book, the Condon Committee, the French GEPAN/SEPRA, and Uruguay's current Air Force study).
A comprehensive scientific review of cases where physical evidence was available was carried out by the 1998 Sturrock panel, with specific examples of many of the categories listed below.
Ufology is a neologism describing the collective efforts of those who study UFO reports and associated evidence.
Some ufologists recommend that observations be classified according to the features of the phenomenon or object that are reported or recorded. Typical categories include:
Hynek's system involves dividing the sighted object by appearance, subdivided further into the type of "close encounter" (a term from which the film director Steven Spielberg derived the title of his 1977 UFO movie, Close Encounters of the Third Kind).
Jacques Vallée's system classifies UFOs into five broad types, each with from three to five subtypes that vary according to type.
One example is the response to local beliefs that "extraterrestrial beings" in UFOs were responsible for crop circles appearing in Indonesia, which the government and the National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN) described as "man-made". Thomas Djamaluddin, research professor of astronomy and astrophysics at LAPAN stated: "We have come to agree that this 'thing' cannot be scientifically proven. Scientists have put UFOs in the category of pseudoscience."
UFOs are sometimes an element of conspiracy theories in which governments are allegedly intentionally "covering up" the existence of aliens by removing physical evidence of their presence, or even collaborating with extraterrestrial beings. There are many versions of this story; some are exclusive, while others overlap with various other conspiracy theories.
In the U.S., an opinion poll conducted in 1997 suggested that 80% of Americans believed the U.S. government was withholding such information. Various notables have also expressed such views. Some examples are astronauts Gordon Cooper and Edgar Mitchell, Senator Barry Goldwater, Vice Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter (the first CIA director), Lord Hill-Norton (former British Chief of Defense Staff and NATO head), the 1999 French COMETA study by various French generals and aerospace experts, and Yves Sillard (former director of CNES, new director of French UFO research organization GEIPAN).
It has also been suggested by a few paranormal authors that all or most human technology and culture is based on extraterrestrial contact (see also ancient astronauts).
In popular culture
UFOs have constituted a widespread international cultural phenomenon since the 1950s. Gallup Polls rank UFOs near the top of lists for subjects of widespread recognition. In 1973, a survey found that 95 percent of the public reported having heard of UFOs, whereas only 92 percent had heard of U.S. President Gerald Ford in a 1977 poll taken just nine months after he left the White House. A 1996 Gallup Poll reported that 71 percent of the United States population believed that the U.S. government was covering up information regarding UFOs. A 2002 Roper Poll for the Sci-Fi Channel found similar results, but with more people believing that UFOs are extraterrestrial craft. In that latest poll, 56 percent thought UFOs were real craft and 48 percent that aliens had visited the Earth. Again, about 70 percent felt the government was not sharing everything it knew about UFOs or extraterrestrial life.
Another effect of the flying saucer type of UFO sightings has been Earth-made flying saucer craft in space fiction, for example the United Planets Cruiser C57D in Forbidden Planet (1956), the Jupiter 2 in Lost in Space, and the saucer section of the USS Enterprise in Star Trek, and many others.