مهاجرت هندوآریایی‌ها: تفاوت میان نسخه‌ها

از ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد
محتوای حذف‌شده محتوای افزوده‌شده
صفحه‌ای جدید حاوی «{{Other uses|Indo-Aryan migration (disambiguation)}} File:Indo-Iranian origins.png|thumb|300px|Archaeological cultures associated with [[...» ایجاد کرد
(بدون تفاوت)

نسخهٔ ‏۲۹ ژانویهٔ ۲۰۱۳، ساعت ۱۳:۰۷

Archaeological cultures associated with Indo-Iranian migrations (after EIEC).

فرضیه مهاجرت و کوچ هند و آرین مربوط به داستان مهاجرت اقوام آریایی یا اقوام سفید پوست در دوره ای ماقبل تاریخ از مناطقی در شمال شرق اروپا و شمال غرب آسیا به داخل فلات ایران و غرب و جنوب کوههای هیمالیا و فلات تمدن رود سند می باشد..[۱] genetic[۲] and even archaeological sources, as well as from a multitude of data stemming from Vedic religion, rituals, poetics, as well as some aspects of social organization and chariot technology. According to Shaffer, archaeological evidence for a mass population movement, or an invasion of South Asia in the pre- or proto- historic periods, has not been found.خطای یادکرد: برچسب <ref> غیرمجاز؛ نام‌های غیرمجاز یا بیش از اندازه ().

انسان شناسی فیزیکی

Based on examination of skeletal remains, no evidence of massive migration has been found.[۳][۴][۵] The ancient Harappans were not markedly different from modern populations in Northwestern India and present-day Pakistan. Craniometric data showed similarity with prehistoric peoples of the Iranian plateau and Western Asia,[۶] although Mohenjodaro was distinct from the other areas of the Indus Valley.[۷] Cephalic measures, however, may not be a good indicator as they do not necessarily indicate ethnicity and they might vary in different environments.[۸]

سناریوهای متعدد

انسان شناسی ژنتیکی

Language change resulting from the migration of numerically small superstrate groups would be difficult to trace genetically. Historically attested events, such as invasions by Huns, Greeks, Kushans, Mughals and modern Europeans, may have had negligible genetic impact, and if they did it can be hard to trace it. For example, despite centuries of Greek rule in Northwest India, no trace of either the I-M170 or the E-M35 Y DNA paternal haplogroups associated with Greek and Macedonian males lines have been found.[۹] On the other hand, evidence of E-M35 and J-M12, another supposed Greek or Balkan marker, has been found in three Pakistani populations – the Burusho, Kalash and Pathan – who claim descent from Greek soldiers.[۱۰]

The terms North Indian and South Indian are ethno-linguistic categories, with North Indian corresponding to Indo-European-speaking peoples and South Indian corresponding to Dravidian-speaking; however, because of admixture, these two groups often overlap.[۱۱][۱۲] Certain sample populations of upper caste North Indians show affinity to Central Asian caucasians, whereas southern Indian Brahmins' relationship is further.[۱۳][۱۴] Some reports emphasize the finding that tribal and caste populations in South Asia derive largely from a common maternal heritage of Pleistocene southern and western Asians, with only limited gene flow from external regions since the start of the Holocene.[۹][۱۵][۱۶] However, this finding alone does not rule out the possibility of an elitist and/or male-predominant Aryan invasion of the Indian subcontinent as in fact the patterns of historical conquest and migration are ultimately reflected in terms of sex-biased admixture, with the mitochondrial heritage being more stable and of more local origin and the Y-chromosomal heritage reflecting an external influence upon the population genetic structure, as can be seen in not only such regions as South Asia,[۱۷] but also in such regions as Northeastern Africa (Semitic Y chromosomes vs. Niger-Kordofanian mtDNA)[۱۸] and Latin America (Iberian Y chromosomes vs. Amerindian mtDNA).[۱۹] Furthermore, the majority of researchers have found significant evidence in support of Indo-European migration and even "elite dominance" of the northern half of the Indian subcontinent, usually pointing to three separate lines of evidence: the previously widespread distribution of Dravidian speakers, now confined to the south of India; the fact that upper caste Brahmins share a close genetic affinity with West Eurasians, whereas low caste Indians tend to have more in common with aboriginals or East Asians; and the comparatively recent introgression of West Eurasian DNA into the aboriginal population of the post-Neolithic Indo-Gangetic plain.[۲۰][۲۱][۲۲]

متن های تاریخی

متن میتانی

کتاب ریگ ودا

Geography of the Rigveda, with river names; the extent of the Swat and Cemetery H cultures are indicated.

متن های زرتشتی و اوستایی

The religious practices depicted in the Rgveda and those depicted in the Avesta, the central religious text of Zoroastrianism—the ancient Iranian faith founded by the prophet Zarathustra—have in common the deity Mitra, priests called hotṛ in the Rgveda and zaotar in the Avesta, and the use of a hallucinogenic compound that the Rgveda calls soma and the Avesta haoma. However, the Indo-Aryan deva 'god' is cognate with the Iranian daēva 'demon'. Similarly, the Indo-Aryan asura 'name of a particular group of gods' (later on, 'demon') is cognate with the Iranian ahura 'lord, god,' which 19th and early 20th century authors such as Burrow explained as a reflection of religious rivalry between Indo-Aryans and Iranians.[۲۳]

Two alternative dates for Zarathustra can be found in Greek sources: an unlikely 5000 years before the Trojan War, i.e. 6000 BC, or 258 years before Alexander, i.e. the 6th century BC, the latter of which used to provide the conventional dating but has since been traced to a fictional Greek source.[نیازمند منبع] Most linguists such as Burrow argue that the strong similarity between the Avestan language of the Gāthās—the oldest part of the Avesta—and the Vedic Sanskrit of the Rgveda pushes the dating of Zarathustra or at least the Gathas closer to the conventional Rgveda dating of 1500–1200 BC, i.e. 1100 BC, possibly earlier. Boyce concurs with a lower date of 1100 BC and tentatively proposes an upper date of 1500 BC. Gnoli dates the Gathas to around 1000 BC, as does (Mallory 1989), with the caveat of a 400 year leeway on either side, i.e. between 1400 and 600 BC. Therefore the date of the Avesta could also indicate the date of the Rigveda.[۲۴]

There is mention in the Avesta of Airyanəm Vaējah, one of the '16 the lands of the Aryans' as well as Zarathustra himself.[نیازمند منبع] Gnoli's interpretation of geographic references in the Avesta situates the Airyanem Vaejah in the Hindu Kush. For similar reasons, Boyce excludes places north of the Syr Darya and western Iranian places. With some reservations, Skjaervo concurs that the evidence of the Avestan texts makes it impossible to avoid the conclusion that they were composed somewhere in northeastern Iran. Witzel points to the central Afghan highlands. Humbach derives Vaējah from cognates of the Vedic root "vij," suggesting the region of fast-flowing rivers. Gnoli considers Choresmia (Xvairizem), the lower Oxus region, south of the Aral Sea to be an outlying area in the Avestan world. However, according to (Mallory و Mair 2000), the probable homeland of Avestan is, in fact, the area south of the Aral Sea.[۲۵]

ودیک هندویی

متن پوراناس

همچنین نگاه شود به

Notes

  1. The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate, Edwin Bryant, 2001
  2. Wells, Spencer; Read, Mark (2002). The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey (illustrated ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN 069111532X.
  3. خطای یادکرد: خطای یادکرد:برچسب <ref>‎ غیرمجاز؛ متنی برای یادکردهای با نام ReferenceB وارد نشده است. (صفحهٔ راهنما را مطالعه کنید.).
  4. خطای یادکرد: خطای یادکرد:برچسب <ref>‎ غیرمجاز؛ متنی برای یادکردهای با نام Erdosy 1995 54 وارد نشده است. (صفحهٔ راهنما را مطالعه کنید.).
  5. خطای یادکرد: خطای یادکرد:برچسب <ref>‎ غیرمجاز؛ متنی برای یادکردهای با نام ReferenceC وارد نشده است. (صفحهٔ راهنما را مطالعه کنید.).
  6. خطای یادکرد: خطای یادکرد:برچسب <ref>‎ غیرمجاز؛ متنی برای یادکردهای با نام Erdosy 1995 49 وارد نشده است. (صفحهٔ راهنما را مطالعه کنید.).
  7. خطای یادکرد: خطای یادکرد:برچسب <ref>‎ غیرمجاز؛ متنی برای یادکردهای با نام kark49 وارد نشده است. (صفحهٔ راهنما را مطالعه کنید.).
  8. on the use of which, however, see Holloway (2002)
  9. ۹٫۰ ۹٫۱ Kivisild et al. (2003)
  10. Firasat; Khaliq, Shagufta; Mohyuddin, Aisha; Papaioannou, Myrto; Tyler-Smith, Chris; Underhill, Peter A; Ayub, Qasim (2006), "Y-chromosomal evidence for a limited Greek contribution to the Pathan population of Pakistan", European Journal of Human Genetics, 15 (1): 121–126, doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201726, PMC 2588664, PMID 17047675
  11. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.1330710305/abstract
  12. http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/reprints/IGVdb.pdf
  13. http://genome.cshlp.org/content/13/10/2277.short
  14. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.21246/abstract
  15. "There is general agreement that Indian caste and tribal populations share a common late Pleistocene maternal ancestry in India." Sahoo et al. (2006)
  16. Sharma et al. (2005)
  17. http://www.hygienecentral.org.uk/pdf/Cordaux%20Current.pdf
  18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1376879/?tool=pmcentrez
  19. http://www.pnas.org/content/107/suppl.2/8954.full
  20. http://genome.cshlp.org/content/11/6/994.full
  21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC419996/
  22. http://genome.cshlp.org/content/13/10/2277.full.pdf+html
  23. Burrow as cited in Mallory (1989).
  24. Bryant (2001:131)
    Mallory (1989)
    Mallory & Mair (2000)
    Burrow, as cited in Mallory (1989)
    Boyce and Gnoli, as cited in Bryant (2001:132)
  25. Bryant (2001:133)
    Gnoli, Boyce, Skjaervo, and Witzel, as cited in Bryant (2001:133)
    Humbach and Gnoli, as cited in Bryant (2001:327)
    Mallory & Mair (2000)

Bibliography and References

External links

Archaeology

Genetics

Religious and political aspects

Related Video

fa:کوچ هندوآرین