باروری و هوش: تفاوت میان نسخه‌ها

محتوای حذف‌شده محتوای افزوده‌شده

درخط

نسخهٔ ‏۳ دسامبر ۲۰۲۲، ساعت ۰۰:۱۹

باروری و هوش (انگلیسی: Fertility and intelligence) رابطه بین باروری و هوش در بسیاری از مطالعات جمعیت‌شناسی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته‌است. شواهدی وجود دارد که در سطح جمعیت، معیارهای هوش مانند پیشرفت تحصیلی و سواد با نرخ باروری در برخی زمینه‌ها همبستگی منفی دارد.^[۱] با این حال، مطالعات ژنتیکی شواهدی برای اثرات تبه‌ژن‌شناسی (دیسژنیک) در جمعیت‌های انسانی نشان نداده‌است.^[۲]^[۳]^[۴]^[۵] نظریه‌های مربوط به اثرات تبه‌ژن‌شناسی و به‌نژادی در جمعیت‌های انسانی از لحاظ تاریخی با نژادگرایی علمی مرتبط بوده‌است.^[۶]^[۷]

جستارهای وابسته

تبه‌ژن‌شناسی

منابع

↑ Graff HJ (March 1979). "Literacy, education, and fertility, past and present: A critical review". Population and Development Review. 5 (1): 105–40. doi:10.2307/1972320. JSTOR 1972320.
↑ Fischbach, Karl-Friedrich; Niggeschmidt, Martin (2022). "Do the Dumb Get Dumber and the Smart Get Smarter?". Heritability of Intelligence. Springer. pp. 37–39. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-35321-6_9. ISBN 978-3-658-35321-6. S2CID 244640696. Since the nineteenth century, a 'race deterioration' has been repeatedly predicted as a result of the excessive multiplication of less gifted people (Galton 1869; see also Fig. 9.1). Nevertheless, the educational and qualification level of people in the industrialized countries has risen strongly. The fact that the 'test intelligence' has also significantly increased (Flynn 2013), is difficult to explain for supporters of the dysgenic thesis: they suspect that the 'phenotypic intelligence' has increased for environmental reasons, while the 'genotypic quality' secretly decreases (Lynn 1996, p. 111). There is neither evidence nor proof for this theory.
↑ Conley, Dalton; Laidley, Thomas; Belsky, Daniel W.; Fletcher, Jason M.; Boardman, Jason D.; Domingue, Benjamin W. (14 June 2016). "Assortative mating and differential fertility by phenotype and genotype across the 20th century". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113:24 (24): 6647–6652. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523592113. PMC 4914190. PMID 27247411.
↑ Bratsberg, Bernt; Rogeberg, Ole (26 June 2018). "Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115:26 (26): 6674–6678. doi:10.1073/pnas.1718793115. PMC 6042097. PMID 29891660.
↑ Neisser, Ulric (1998). The Rising Curve: Long-Term Gains in IQ and Related Measures. American Psychological Association. pp. xiii–xiv. ISBN 978-1-55798-503-3. There is no convincing evidence that any dysgenic trend exists. . . . It turns out, counterintuitively, that differential birth rates (for groups scoring high and low on a trait) do not necessarily produces changes in the population mean.
↑ Carlson, Elof Axel (2001). The unfit: a history of a bad idea. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 0-87969-658-3. OCLC 46959597.
↑ Devlin, Bernie (1997). Intelligence, genes, and success: scientists respond to The bell curve. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-98234-5. OCLC 36590694.

مشارکت‌کنندگان ویکی‌پدیا. «Fertility and intelligence». در دانشنامهٔ ویکی‌پدیای انگلیسی، بازبینی‌شده در ۳ دسامبر ۲۰۲۲.

[jstor.org-1] Graff HJ (March 1979). "Literacy, education, and fertility, past and present: A critical review". Population and Development Review. 5 (1): 105–40. doi:10.2307/1972320. JSTOR 1972320.

[2] Fischbach, Karl-Friedrich; Niggeschmidt, Martin (2022). "Do the Dumb Get Dumber and the Smart Get Smarter?". Heritability of Intelligence. Springer. pp. 37–39. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-35321-6_9. ISBN 978-3-658-35321-6. S2CID 244640696. Since the nineteenth century, a 'race deterioration' has been repeatedly predicted as a result of the excessive multiplication of less gifted people (Galton 1869; see also Fig. 9.1). Nevertheless, the educational and qualification level of people in the industrialized countries has risen strongly. The fact that the 'test intelligence' has also significantly increased (Flynn 2013), is difficult to explain for supporters of the dysgenic thesis: they suspect that the 'phenotypic intelligence' has increased for environmental reasons, while the 'genotypic quality' secretly decreases (Lynn 1996, p. 111). There is neither evidence nor proof for this theory.

[3] Conley, Dalton; Laidley, Thomas; Belsky, Daniel W.; Fletcher, Jason M.; Boardman, Jason D.; Domingue, Benjamin W. (14 June 2016). "Assortative mating and differential fertility by phenotype and genotype across the 20th century". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113:24 (24): 6647–6652. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523592113. PMC 4914190. PMID 27247411.

[4] Bratsberg, Bernt; Rogeberg, Ole (26 June 2018). "Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115:26 (26): 6674–6678. doi:10.1073/pnas.1718793115. PMC 6042097. PMID 29891660.

[5] Neisser, Ulric (1998). The Rising Curve: Long-Term Gains in IQ and Related Measures. American Psychological Association. pp. xiii–xiv. ISBN 978-1-55798-503-3. There is no convincing evidence that any dysgenic trend exists. . . . It turns out, counterintuitively, that differential birth rates (for groups scoring high and low on a trait) do not necessarily produces changes in the population mean.

[6] Carlson, Elof Axel (2001). The unfit: a history of a bad idea. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. ISBN 0-87969-658-3. OCLC 46959597.

[7] Devlin, Bernie (1997). Intelligence, genes, and success: scientists respond to The bell curve. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-98234-5. OCLC 36590694.

[۱]

[۲]

[۳]

[۴]

[۵]

[۶]

[۷]