مدیریت خطر یا مدیریت ریسک کاربرد سیستماتیک سیاستهای مدیریتی، رویهها و فرایندهای مربوط به فعالیتهای تحلیل، ارزیابی و کنترل ریسک میباشد. مدیریت ریسک عبارت از فرایند مستندسازی تصمیمات نهایی اتخاذ شده و شناسایی و بهکارگیری معیارهایی است که میتوان از آنها جهت رساندن ریسک تا سطحی قابل قبول استفاده کرد.
فرایند مدیریت ریسک[ویرایش]
بنا به تعریف ایزو ۳۱۰۰۰، فرایند مدیریت خطر دارای چندین مرحله است:
اصول مدیریت ریسک[ویرایش]
مدیریت ریسک یک از قسمتهای محوری مدیریت استراتژیک هر سازمان به شمار میرود. این شیوه شامل فرایندهایی است که از طریق آن سازمانها میتوانند به صورت روشمند خطرهای مرتبط با فعالیتهایشان را شناسایی کنند. یک رویکرد مدیریت خطر موفق باید با سطح خطر در سازمان متناسب و با دیگر فعالیتهای سازمان همراستا باشد. از دیگر ویژگیهای مدیریت خطر موفق میتوان به جامعیت گستره کار، گرهخوردگی با فعالیت روزمره، و پویایی در پاسخگویی به شرایط نام برد.
بسیاری از پروژهها که فرض میشود تحت کنترل هستند، با ریسک به عنوان رخدادی شناختهنشده روبرو گردیده و کوشش میکنند آن را کنترل کنند. با درنظر گرفتن این مفاهیم پایهای، امکان مقابله با ریسک به وجود میآید؛ لذا ابتدا باید نسبت به شناسایی ریسکهای محتمل پروژه اقدام کرد. این کار با دستهبندی ساختار کارها و با پرسش چند سؤال از خود یا اعضای گروه پروژه، امکانپذیر است. برای تخصیص مقادیر احتمالی به ریسکها از مقادیر پیشنهادی زیر میتوان استفاده کرد: قریبالوقوع بزرگتر از ۸۵٪ بالا = ۸۵٪ محتمل = ۶۰٪ متوسط = ۵۰٪ ممکن = ۴۰٪ پایین = ۱۵٪ غیرمحتمل = ۱۵٪ اکنون احتمال وقوع هر ریسک قابل محاسبهاست. راه دیگر، نسبت دادن درصد وزنی به هریک از ریسکهاست. مشکل اصلی این روش آن است که همواره دادههای تجربی به اندازه کافی در دسترس نیستند تا این کار به دقت انجام گیرد. در این روش معمولاً افراد باتجربهای مبادرت به این کار میکنند که تجارب جامعی از انواع رویدادها در پروژههای مختلف کسب کردهاند؛ مجموع درصدهای تخصیصی به رویدادها بایستی صد باشد.
در مرحله بعد به هر ریسک، یک مقدار نسبت دهید. این مقدار میتواند در صورت نیاز برحسب هزینه یا زمان باشد؛ به عنوان مثال اگر هدف تعیین زمان اتمام پروژهاست، هر ایدهای در مورد مدت زمان فعالیتها میتواند یک سناریوی ریسک محسوب شود. در این مرحله میتوان مقدار حقیقی ریسک را با محاسبه حاصلضرب مقادیر تخصیص داده شده به ریسک و احتمال وقوع آن به دست آورد و با توجه به نتایج حاصل میتوان نسبت به انجام عملی یا به تعویق انداختن آن تصمیمگیری نمود. بعد از انجام مراحل مدیریت ریسک، میتوانید فرایندهای نگهداری مجموعه ریسک را آغاز کنید. برای این کار بازنگری دورهای ریسک را آغاز کنید که مبتنی بر پیچیدگی و مدت پروژه و وقوع تغییرات پروژهاست.
آغاز اجرای این کار ممکن است بیهوده و هزینه زا به نظر آید اما چنانچه یکبار این کار را انجام دهید و ریسکها را شناسایی و به صورت کمی آنها را کنترل کنید در آن صورت به ارزش مدیریت ریسک پی خواهید برد؛ بنابراین در مرحله نخست اقدام به شناسایی ریسکهای پروژه در بالاترین سطح WBS کنید و از اینکه راه به سطوح پایینتر مییابید نگران نباشید. بعد از چند بار انجام این کار، مسئله خیلی واضحتر خواهد شد.
مدیریت خطر پروژههای عمرانی[ویرایش]
در طی سالهای اخیر، تحقیقات گستردهای در زمینه مدیریت خطر پروژههای عمرانی انجام گرفته است. غالباً این نوع از پروژهها در برگیرنده تعداد زیادی ذینفع میباشد که مدنظر قرار دادن منافع، اهداف و مطالبات آنها در اتخاذ تصمیمها یکی از موارد لازم برای اطمینان از موفقیت پروژه میباشد.
ساختار شکست خطر که بازنمودی طبقهبندی شده از ریسکهای پروژه ارائه مینماید، متشکل از گروهها و زیر گروههای سازمان یافته خطر بوده و ابزاری بسیار مؤثر در شناسایی منابع و آثار محتمل ریسکها میباشد. این نوع باز نمود ریسکها دارای مزایای فراوانی در مدیریت ریسک پروژههای عمرانی است. بخشی از دلایل این مدعا عبارتند از: توانایی در تجزیه و تحلیل خطرهای پروژه و امکان داشتن دیدگاه خاص نسبت به خطر برای هر یک از اعضای ذینفع پروژه. ساختار شکست خطر دارای چندین ضعف اساسی نیز میباشد از قبیل: عدم وجود راهنما، روش و اجماع در چگونگی طراحی برای یک پروژه جدید با ویژگیهای خاص خود، وجود تعاریف مبهم و بعضاً متناقض خطرها، عدم وجود روشی مشترک و مؤثر برای انتقال اطلاعات کمی و کیفی وقایع خطر به منظور محاسبه مقادیر ریسک هر گروه ریسک.
روشی نوین برای طراحی ساختار شکست سازگار برای هر پروژه یا شرایط خاص ارائه شده که با مقطع زمانی و میزان پیشرفت پروژه و همچنین دیدگاههای متفاوت ذینفعان پروژه نسبت به ریسکها سازگار است. این روش متضمن اعمال مدیریت ریسک پویا، چند مقیاسی و چند بعدی در پروژهها بوده و هر یک از اعضای پروژه در هر مقطع زمانی خاص قادر خواهد بود بر ریسکهای مورد نظر خود تمرکز نموده و برای کسب اطلاعات جامعتر، هر گروه ریسک در ساختار شکست خطر را به تعداد بیشتری زیر گروه تجزیه نماید. چنین رویهای ابزار و روش لازم برای شناسایی و مدیریت سیستماتیک، موثرتر و رسمیتر ریسکهای پروژه را فراهم مینماید. فرایند طراحی ساختار شکست خطرهای سفارشی با بازسازی تمامی ساختار شکست خطرهای ممکن از طریق ترکیب ریز درختهای موجود در بانک اطلاعاتی آغاز شده و سپس برای انتخاب بهترین ساختار، تمامی گزینههای ممکن به واسطه معیارهای کیفیت تعریف شده مقایسه میشوند.
نرمافزار خاصی بر اساس تمامی مفاهیم و الگوریتمهای موجود در روشهای توسعه داده شده، تسهیل کاربرد عملی روشهای ارائه شده در پروژههای واقعی، را برعهده دارد. این نرمافزار ابتدا تمامی ساختار شکست خطرهای ممکن را تولید نموده، مقادیر خطر را محاسبه کرده و به طور خودکار برای هر ساختار شکست خطر پنج فاکتور کیفیت محاسبه مینماید. در گام دوم، تمامی ساختار شکست خطرهای ایجاد شده با استفاده از یکی از روشهای تصمیمگیری چند معیاری رتبهبندی شده، کاربر قادر خواهد بود بهترین ساختار شکست خطر را انتخاب نماید. نرمافزار قادر است به طور گرافیکی ساختار درختی تمامی ساختار شکست خطرهای طراحی شده را به همراه مقادیر خطر محاسبه شده و توزیع وقایع خطر نمایش دهد.
Risk management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks (defined in ISO 31000 as the effect of uncertainty on objectives) followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities. Risk management’s objective is to assure uncertainty does not deflect the endeavor from the business goals.
Risks can come from various sources including uncertainty in financial markets, threats from project failures (at any phase in design, development, production, or sustainment life-cycles), legal liabilities, credit risk, accidents, natural causes and disasters, deliberate attack from an adversary, or events of uncertain or unpredictable root-cause. There are two types of events i.e. negative events can be classified as risks while positive events are classified as opportunities. Several risk management standards have been developed including the Project Management Institute, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, actuarial societies, and ISO standards. Methods, definitions and goals vary widely according to whether the risk management method is in the context of project management, security, engineering, industrial processes, financial portfolios, actuarial assessments, or public health and safety.
Strategies to manage threats (uncertainties with negative consequences) typically include avoiding the threat, reducing the negative effect or probability of the threat, transferring all or part of the threat to another party, and even retaining some or all of the potential or actual consequences of a particular threat, and the opposites for opportunities (uncertain future states with benefits).
Certain aspects of many of the risk management standards have come under criticism for having no measurable improvement on risk; whereas the confidence in estimates and decisions seem to increase. For example, one study found that one in six IT projects were "black swans" with gigantic overruns (cost overruns averaged 200%, and schedule overruns 70%).
A widely used vocabulary for risk management is defined by ISO Guide 73:2009, "Risk management. Vocabulary."
In ideal risk management, a prioritization process is followed whereby the risks with the greatest loss (or impact) and the greatest probability of occurring are handled first, and risks with lower probability of occurrence and lower loss are handled in descending order. In practice the process of assessing overall risk can be difficult, and balancing resources used to mitigate between risks with a high probability of occurrence but lower loss versus a risk with high loss but lower probability of occurrence can often be mishandled.
Intangible risk management identifies a new type of a risk that has a 100% probability of occurring but is ignored by the organization due to a lack of identification ability. For example, when deficient knowledge is applied to a situation, a knowledge risk materializes. Relationship risk appears when ineffective collaboration occurs. Process-engagement risk may be an issue when ineffective operational procedures are applied. These risks directly reduce the productivity of knowledge workers, decrease cost-effectiveness, profitability, service, quality, reputation, brand value, and earnings quality. Intangible risk management allows risk management to create immediate value from the identification and reduction of risks that reduce productivity.
Risk management also faces difficulties in allocating resources. This is the idea of opportunity cost. Resources spent on risk management could have been spent on more profitable activities. Again, ideal risk management minimizes spending (or manpower or other resources) and also minimizes the negative effects of risks.
According to the definition to the risk, the risk is the possibility that an event will occur and adversely affect the achievement of an objective. Therefore, risk itself has the uncertainty. Risk management such as COSO ERM, can help managers have a good control for their risk. Each company may have different internal control components, which leads to different outcomes. For example, the framework for ERM components includes Internal Environment, Objective Setting, Event Identification, Risk Assessment, Risk Response, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring.
For the most part, these methods consist of the following elements, performed, more or less, in the following order.
Principles of risk management
Risk management should:
Establishing the context
After establishing the context, the next step in the process of managing risk is to identify potential risks. Risks are about events that, when triggered, cause problems or benefits. Hence, risk identification can start with the source of our problems and those of our competitors (benefit), or with the problem itself.
Examples of risk sources are: stakeholders of a project, employees of a company or the weather over an airport.
When either source or problem is known, the events that a source may trigger or the events that can lead to a problem can be investigated. For example: stakeholders withdrawing during a project may endanger funding of the project; confidential information may be stolen by employees even within a closed network; lightning striking an aircraft during takeoff may make all people on board immediate casualties.
The chosen method of identifying risks may depend on culture, industry practice and compliance. The identification methods are formed by templates or the development of templates for identifying source, problem or event. Common risk identification methods are:
Once risks have been identified, they must then be assessed as to their potential severity of impact (generally a negative impact, such as damage or loss) and to the probability of occurrence. These quantities can be either simple to measure, in the case of the value of a lost building, or impossible to know for sure in the case of an unlikely event, the probability of occurrence of which is unknown. Therefore, in the assessment process it is critical to make the best educated decisions in order to properly prioritize the implementation of the risk management plan.
Even a short-term positive improvement can have long-term negative impacts. Take the "turnpike" example. A highway is widened to allow more traffic. More traffic capacity leads to greater development in the areas surrounding the improved traffic capacity. Over time, traffic thereby increases to fill available capacity. Turnpikes thereby need to be expanded in a seemingly endless cycles. There are many other engineering examples where expanded capacity (to do any function) is soon filled by increased demand. Since expansion comes at a cost, the resulting growth could become unsustainable without forecasting and management.
The fundamental difficulty in risk assessment is determining the rate of occurrence since statistical information is not available on all kinds of past incidents and is particularly scanty in the case of catastrophic events, simply because of their infrequency. Furthermore, evaluating the severity of the consequences (impact) is often quite difficult for intangible assets. Asset valuation is another question that needs to be addressed. Thus, best educated opinions and available statistics are the primary sources of information. Nevertheless, risk assessment should produce such information for senior executives of the organization that the primary risks are easy to understand and that the risk management decisions may be prioritized within overall company goals. Thus, there have been several theories and attempts to quantify risks. Numerous different risk formulae exist, but perhaps the most widely accepted formula for risk quantification is: "Rate (or probability) of occurrence multiplied by the impact of the event equals risk magnitude."[vague]
Risk mitigation measures are usually formulated according to one or more of the following major risk options, which are:
Later research has shown that the financial benefits of risk management are less dependent on the formula used but are more dependent on the frequency and how risk assessment is performed.
In business it is imperative to be able to present the findings of risk assessments in financial, market, or schedule terms. Robert Courtney Jr. (IBM, 1970) proposed a formula for presenting risks in financial terms. The Courtney formula was accepted as the official risk analysis method for the US governmental agencies. The formula proposes calculation of ALE (annualized loss expectancy) and compares the expected loss value to the security control implementation costs (cost-benefit analysis).
Potential risk treatments
Once risks have been identified and assessed, all techniques to manage the risk fall into one or more of these four major categories:
Ideal use of these risk control strategies may not be possible. Some of them may involve trade-offs that are not acceptable to the organization or person making the risk management decisions. Another source, from the US Department of Defense (see link), Defense Acquisition University, calls these categories ACAT, for Avoid, Control, Accept, or Transfer. This use of the ACAT acronym is reminiscent of another ACAT (for Acquisition Category) used in US Defense industry procurements, in which Risk Management figures prominently in decision making and planning.
This includes not performing an activity that could carry risk. An example would be not buying a property or business in order to not take on the legal liability that comes with it. Another would be not flying in order not to take the risk that the airplane were to be hijacked. Avoidance may seem the answer to all risks, but avoiding risks also means losing out on the potential gain that accepting (retaining) the risk may have allowed. Not entering a business to avoid the risk of loss also avoids the possibility of earning profits. Increasing risk regulation in hospitals has led to avoidance of treating higher risk conditions, in favor of patients presenting with lower risk.
Risk reduction or "optimization" involves reducing the severity of the loss or the likelihood of the loss from occurring. For example, sprinklers are designed to put out a fire to reduce the risk of loss by fire. This method may cause a greater loss by water damage and therefore may not be suitable. Halon fire suppression systems may mitigate that risk, but the cost may be prohibitive as a strategy.
Acknowledging that risks can be positive or negative, optimizing risks means finding a balance between negative risk and the benefit of the operation or activity; and between risk reduction and effort applied. By an offshore drilling contractor effectively applying Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) management in its organization, it can optimize risk to achieve levels of residual risk that are tolerable.
Modern software development methodologies reduce risk by developing and delivering software incrementally. Early methodologies suffered from the fact that they only delivered software in the final phase of development; any problems encountered in earlier phases meant costly rework and often jeopardized the whole project. By developing in iterations, software projects can limit effort wasted to a single iteration.
Outsourcing could be an example of risk reduction if the outsourcer can demonstrate higher capability at managing or reducing risks. For example, a company may outsource only its software development, the manufacturing of hard goods, or customer support needs to another company, while handling the business management itself. This way, the company can concentrate more on business development without having to worry as much about the manufacturing process, managing the development team, or finding a physical location for a call center.
Briefly defined as "sharing with another party the burden of loss or the benefit of gain, from a risk, and the measures to reduce a risk."
The term of 'risk transfer' is often used in place of risk sharing in the mistaken belief that you can transfer a risk to a third party through insurance or outsourcing. In practice if the insurance company or contractor go bankrupt or end up in court, the original risk is likely to still revert to the first party. As such in the terminology of practitioners and scholars alike, the purchase of an insurance contract is often described as a "transfer of risk." However, technically speaking, the buyer of the contract generally retains legal responsibility for the losses "transferred", meaning that insurance may be described more accurately as a post-event compensatory mechanism. For example, a personal injuries insurance policy does not transfer the risk of a car accident to the insurance company. The risk still lies with the policy holder namely the person who has been in the accident. The insurance policy simply provides that if an accident (the event) occurs involving the policy holder then some compensation may be payable to the policy holder that is commensurate with the suffering/damage.
Some ways of managing risk fall into multiple categories. Risk retention pools are technically retaining the risk for the group, but spreading it over the whole group involves transfer among individual members of the group. This is different from traditional insurance, in that no premium is exchanged between members of the group up front, but instead losses are assessed to all members of the group.
Involves accepting the loss, or benefit of gain, from a risk when it occurs. True self-insurance falls in this category. Risk retention is a viable strategy for small risks where the cost of insuring against the risk would be greater over time than the total losses sustained. All risks that are not avoided or transferred are retained by default. This includes risks that are so large or catastrophic that either they cannot be insured against or the premiums would be infeasible. War is an example since most property and risks are not insured against war, so the loss attributed by war is retained by the insured. Also any amounts of potential loss (risk) over the amount insured is retained risk. This may also be acceptable if the chance of a very large loss is small or if the cost to insure for greater coverage amounts is so great that it would hinder the goals of the organization too much.
Risk management plan
Select appropriate controls or countermeasures to measure each risk. Risk mitigation needs to be approved by the appropriate level of management. For instance, a risk concerning the image of the organization should have top management decision behind it whereas IT management would have the authority to decide on computer virus risks.
The risk management plan should propose applicable and effective security controls for managing the risks. For example, an observed high risk of computer viruses could be mitigated by acquiring and implementing antivirus software. A good risk management plan should contain a schedule for control implementation and responsible persons for those actions.
According to ISO/IEC 27001, the stage immediately after completion of the risk assessment phase consists of preparing a Risk Treatment Plan, which should document the decisions about how each of the identified risks should be handled. Mitigation of risks often means selection of security controls, which should be documented in a Statement of Applicability, which identifies which particular control objectives and controls from the standard have been selected, and why.
Implementation follows all of the planned methods for mitigating the effect of the risks. Purchase insurance policies for the risks that it has been decided to transferred to an insurer, avoid all risks that can be avoided without sacrificing the entity's goals, reduce others, and retain the rest.
Review and evaluation of the plan
Initial risk management plans will never be perfect. Practice, experience, and actual loss results will necessitate changes in the plan and contribute information to allow possible different decisions to be made in dealing with the risks being faced.
Risk analysis results and management plans should be updated periodically. There are two primary reasons for this:
Prioritizing the risk management processes too highly could keep an organization from ever completing a project or even getting started. This is especially true if other work is suspended until the risk management process is considered complete.
It is also important to keep in mind the distinction between risk and uncertainty. Risk can be measured by impacts × probability.
If risks are improperly assessed and prioritized, time can be wasted in dealing with risk of losses that are not likely to occur. Spending too much time assessing and managing unlikely risks can divert resources that could be used more profitably. Unlikely events do occur but if the risk is unlikely enough to occur it may be better to simply retain the risk and deal with the result if the loss does in fact occur. Qualitative risk assessment is subjective and lacks consistency. The primary justification for a formal risk assessment process is legal and bureaucratic.
As applied to corporate finance, risk management is the technique for measuring, monitoring and controlling the financial or operational risk on a firm's balance sheet, a traditional measure is the value at risk (VaR), but there also other measures like profit at risk (PaR) or margin at risk. The Basel II framework breaks risks into market risk (price risk), credit risk and operational risk and also specifies methods for calculating capital requirements for each of these components.
In Information Technology, Risk management includes "Incident Handling", an action plan for dealing with intrusions, cyber-theft, denial of service, fire, floods, and other security-related events. According to the SANS Institute, it is a six step process: Preparation, Identification, Containment, Eradication, Recovery, and Lessons Learned.
In enterprise risk management, a risk is defined as a possible event or circumstance that can have negative influences on the enterprise in question. Its impact can be on the very existence, the resources (human and capital), the products and services, or the customers of the enterprise, as well as external impacts on society, markets, or the environment. In a financial institution, enterprise risk management is normally thought of as the combination of credit risk, interest rate risk or asset liability management, liquidity risk, market risk, and operational risk.
In the more general case, every probable risk can have a pre-formulated plan to deal with its possible consequences (to ensure contingency if the risk becomes a liability).
From the information above and the average cost per employee over time, or cost accrual ratio, a project manager can estimate:
Risk in a project or process can be due either to Special Cause Variation or Common Cause Variation and requires appropriate treatment. That is to re-iterate the concern about extremal cases not being equivalent in the list immediately above.
For medical devices, risk management is a process for identifying, evaluating and mitigating risks associated with harm to people and damage to property or the environment. Risk management is an integral part of medical device design and development, production processes and evaluation of field experience, and is applicable to all types of medical devices. The evidence of its application is required by most regulatory bodies such as the US FDA. The management of risks for medical devices is described by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in ISO 14971:2007, Medical Devices—The application of risk management to medical devices, a product safety standard. The standard provides a process framework and associated requirements for management responsibilities, risk analysis and evaluation, risk controls and lifecycle risk management.
The European version of the risk management standard was updated in 2009 and again in 2012 to refer to the Medical Devices Directive (MDD) and Active Implantable Medical Device Directive (AIMDD) revision in 2007, as well as the In Vitro Medical Device Directive (IVDD). The requirements of EN 14971:2012 are nearly identical to ISO 14971:2007. The differences include three "(informative)" Z Annexes that refer to the new MDD, AIMDD, and IVDD. These annexes indicate content deviations that include the requirement for risks to be reduced as far as possible, and the requirement that risks be mitigated by design and not by labeling on the medical device (i.e., labeling can no longer be used to mitigate risk).
Typical risk analysis and evaluation techniques adopted by the medical device industry include hazard analysis, fault tree analysis (FTA), failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), hazard and operability study (HAZOP), and risk traceability analysis for ensuring risk controls are implemented and effective (i.e. tracking risks identified to product requirements, design specifications, verification and validation results etc.). FTA analysis requires diagramming software. FMEA analysis can be done using a spreadsheet program. There are also integrated medical device risk management solutions.
Through a draft guidance, the FDA has introduced another method named "Safety Assurance Case" for medical device safety assurance analysis. The safety assurance case is structured argument reasoning about systems appropriate for scientists and engineers, supported by a body of evidence, that provides a compelling, comprehensible and valid case that a system is safe for a given application in a given environment. With the guidance, a safety assurance case is expected for safety critical devices (e.g. infusion devices) as part of the pre-market clearance submission, e.g. 510(k). In 2013, the FDA introduced another draft guidance expecting medical device manufacturers to submit cybersecurity risk analysis information.
Project risk management must be considered at the different phases of acquisition. In the beginning of a project, the advancement of technical developments, or threats presented by a competitor's projects, may cause a risk or threat assessment and subsequent evaluation of alternatives (see Analysis of Alternatives). Once a decision is made, and the project begun, more familiar project management applications can be used:
Megaprojects (sometimes also called "major programs") are large-scale investment projects, typically costing more than $1000 million per project. Megaprojects include major bridges, tunnels, highways, railways, airports, seaports, power plants, dams, wastewater projects, coastal flood protection schemes, oil and natural gas extraction projects, public buildings, information technology systems, aerospace projects, and defense systems. Megaprojects have been shown to be particularly risky in terms of finance, safety, and social and environmental impacts. Risk management is therefore particularly pertinent for megaprojects and special methods and special education have been developed for such risk management.
It is important to assess risk in regard to natural disasters like floods, earthquakes, and so on. Outcomes of natural disaster risk assessment are valuable when considering future repair costs, business interruption losses and other downtime, effects on the environment, insurance costs, and the proposed costs of reducing the risk. There are regular International Disaster and Risk Conferences in Davos to deal with integral risk management.
IT risk is a risk related to information technology. This is a relatively new term due to an increasing awareness that information security is simply one facet of a multitude of risks that are relevant to IT and the real world processes it supports.
Petroleum and natural gas
For the offshore oil and gas industry, operational risk management is regulated by the safety case regime in many countries. Hazard identification and risk assessment tools and techniques are described in the international standard ISO 17776:2000, and organisations such as the IADC (International Association of Drilling Contractors) publish guidelines for Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Case development which are based on the ISO standard. Further, diagrammatic representations of hazardous events are often expected by governmental regulators as part of risk management in safety case submissions; these are known as bow-tie diagrams (see Network theory in risk assessment). The technique is also used by organisations and regulators in mining, aviation, health, defence, industrial and finance.
The principles and tools for quality risk management are increasingly being applied to different aspects of pharmaceutical quality systems. These aspects include development, manufacturing, distribution, inspection, and submission/review processes throughout the lifecycle of drug substances, drug products, biological and biotechnological products (including the use of raw materials, solvents, excipients, packaging and labeling materials in drug products, biological and biotechnological products). Risk management is also applied to the assessment of microbiological contamination in relation to pharmaceutical products and cleanroom manufacturing environments.
Risk communication is a complex cross-disciplinary academic field related to core values of the targeted audiences. Problems for risk communicators involve how to reach the intended audience, how to make the risk comprehensible and relatable to other risks, how to pay appropriate respect to the audience's values related to the risk, how to predict the audience's response to the communication, etc. A main goal of risk communication is to improve collective and individual decision making. Risk communication is somewhat related to crisis communication. Some experts coincide that risk is not only enrooted in the communication process but also it cannot be dissociated from the use of language. Though each culture develops its own fears and risks, these construes apply only by the hosting culture. Risk would work as a fetish logic, which protects what indeed invests as a frightening-object.