نوشتار وابسته: تاریخنگاری مسلمانان
سیره نبوی دربردارندهٔ زندگینامههای سنتی نوشته شده توسط مسلمانان، دربارهٔ پیامبر اسلام و گفتارهای منتسب به اوست. قدیمیترین زندگینامه از محمّد، نگاشته شده در حدود ۱۲۰ و یا ۱۳۰ سال پس از درگذشتش به قلم ابن اسحاق است، با عنوان «زندگی رسول خدا»؛ که متن اصلی از میان رفته، ولی بخشهایی از آن در آثار نوشته شده توسط تاریخنگاران پس از او یعنی ابن هشام و طبری به جای مانده است. بسیاری از محقّقین البته نه همهٔ آنها، صحّت و سقم این زندگینامههای قدیمی را پذیرفتهاند، در حالیکه میزان اعتبار و درستی آنها قابل سنجش نیست.
به نوشتهٔ چیز رابینسون از محقّقین تاریخ اسلام، تقریباً اطّلاعات معتبر و مدارک موثّقی دربارهٔ زمان و شرایط تولّد محمّد، دوران کودکی و همچنین آغاز بزرگسالی او در دست نیست و احتمالاً نسل اوّل مسلمانان توجّهی به زندگی پیامبرشان قبل از بعثت نداشتهاند و داستانهای نقل شدهٔ موجود، در طی دو سدهٔ بعدی ساخته شدهاند. حتی به نوشتهٔ رسول جعفریان، تعیین تاریخ دقیق تحوّلات ابتدای دورهٔ پیامبری دشوار است، زیرا وقایع به دقّت ثبت نشدهاند و همچنین اشتباهاتی سهوی و یا اغراض قبیلهای و منفعتهای سیاسی، در نقل وقایع آن دوران دخالت داشته است.
مورخین مشهور نویسنده سیره نبوی[ویرایش]
In Islam, Al-sīra al-Nabawiyya (Prophetic biography), Sīrat Rasūl Allāh (Life of the Messenger of God), or Seerah are the traditional Muslim biographies of Muhammad from which, in addition to the Quran and trustable Hadiths, most historical information about his life and the early period of Islam is derived. Ibn Ishaq's sīrat rasūl allāh has been preserved in the form of an edited copy of his oral reports collected by one of his students, al-Bakka'i, which were further edited by ibn Hisham. Of the other authors of sira, none of their books have survived to this day although some quotations and hadith have.
In the Arabic language the word sīra or sīrat (Arabic: سيرة) comes from the verb sāra (Present tense: yasīru), which means to travel or to be on a journey. A person's sīra is that person’s journey through life, or biography, encompassing their birth, events in their life, manners and characteristics, and their death. In modern usage it may also refer to a person's resume. It is sometimes written as "seera", "sirah" or "sirat", all meaning "life" or "journey". In Islamic literature, the plural form, siyar, could also refer to the rules of war and dealing with non-Muslims.
The phrase sīrat rasūl allāh, or al-sīra al-nabawiyya, refers to the study of the life of Muhammad. The term sīra was first linked to the biography of Muhammad by Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri, and later popularized by the work of Ibn Hisham. In the first two centuries of Islamic history, sīra was more commonly known as maghāzī (literally, stories of military expeditions), which is now considered to be only a subset of sīra -- one that concerns the military campaigns of Muhammad.
Early works of sīra consist of multiple historical reports, or akhbār, and each report is called a khabar. Sometimes the word tradition or hadith is used instead.
The sīra literature includes a variety of heterogeneous materials, containing mainly narratives of military expeditions undertaken by Muhammad and his companions. These stories are intended as historical accounts and are used for veneration. The sīra also includes a number of written documents, such as political treaties (e.g., Treaty of Hudaybiyyah or Constitution of Medina), military enlistments, assignments of officials, letters to foreign rulers, and so forth. It also records some of the speeches and sermons made by Muhammad, like his speech at the Farewell Pilgrimage. Some of the sīra accounts include verses of poetry commemorating certain events and battles.
At later periods, certain type of stories included in sīra developed into their own separate genres. One genre is concerned with stories of prophetic miracles, called aʿlām al-nubuwa (literally, "proofs of prophethood"—the first word is sometimes substituted for amārāt or dalāʾil). Another genre, called faḍāʾil wa mathālib — tales that show the merits and faults of individual companions, enemies, and other notable contemporaries of Muhammad. Some works of sīra also positioned the story of Muhammad as part of a narrative that includes stories of earlier prophets, Persian Kings, pre-Islamic Arab tribes, and the Rashidun.
Parts of sīra were inspired by, or elaborate upon, events mentioned in the Qur'an. These parts were often used by writers of tafsir and asbab al-nuzul to provide background information for events mentioned in certain ayat.
Comparison to hadith
In terms of structure, a hadith and a khabar are very similar. They both contain isnads (chains of transmission). Also some historians consider the sīra and maghāzī literature to be a subset of Hadith.
However, the main difference between a hadith and a historical report (khabar) is that a hadith is not concerned with an event as such, and normally does not specify a time or place. Rather the purpose of hadith is to record a religious doctrine as an authoritative source of Islamic law. By contrast, while a khabar may carry some legal or theological implications, its main aim is to convey information about a certain event. Starting from the 8th and 9th century, many scholars have devoted their efforts to both kinds of texts equally.
During the early centuries of Islam, the sīra literature was taken less seriously compared to the hadiths. In Umayyad times, storytellers (qāṣṣ, pl. quṣṣāṣ) used to tell stories of Muhammad and earlier prophets in private gatherings and mosques, given they obtained permission from the authorities. Many of these storytellers are now unknown. After the Umayyad period, their reputation deteriorated because of their inclination to exaggerate and fantasize, and for relying on the Isra'iliyat. Thus they were banned from preaching at mosques. In later periods, however, works of sīra became more prominent. More recently, Western historical criticism and debate concerning sīra have elicited a defensive attitude from some Muslims who wrote apologetic literature defending its content.
For centuries, Muslim scholars have recognized the problem of authenticity of hadith. Thus they have developed sophisticated methods (see Hadith studies) of evaluating isnāds (chains of transmission). This was done in order to classify each hadith into "sound" (ṣaḥīḥ) for authentic reports, as opposed to "weak" (ḍaʿīf) for ones that are probably fabricated, in addition to other categories. Since many sīra reports also contain isnād information and some of the sīra compilers (akhbārīs) were themselves practicing jurists and hadīth transmitters (muḥaddiths), it was possible to apply the same methods of hadīth criticism to the sīra reports. However, some sīra reports were written using an imprecise form of isnād, or what modern historians call the "collective isnād" or "combined reports". The use of collective isnād meant that a report may be related on the authority of multiple persons without distinguishing the words of one person from another. This lack of precision led some hadith scholars to take any report that used a collective isnād to be lacking in authenticity.
According to Wim Raven, it is often noted that a coherent image of Muhammad cannot be formed from the literature of sīra, whose authenticity and factual value have been questioned on a number of different grounds. He lists the following arguments against the authenticity of sīra, followed here by counter arguments:
Early compilations of sīra
The following is a list of some of the early Hadith collectors who specialized in collecting and compiling sīra and maghāzī reports: