سوفسطایی یا سوفیست در لغت به معنای استاد، دانشور و زبردست است. کسی که در امور زندگی هوشمند و زیرک است.
sophist از نظر لغوی، از ترکیب دو جزء sophi به معنای حکمت و معرفت و ist(به معنای گرایش فکری و در جای دیگر به معنای شغل) در اینجا به معنای پیشه، درست شدهاست؛ و در کل به معنی «معرفت پیشه» است. سوفیست لقبی بود که فیلسوفها روی ایشان گذاشتهاند، که بار معنایی منفی داشتهاست، بر خلاف اصطلاح (philosophy) که به معنای «عاشقان معرفت» است و به سوفیستها این را میگفتند که: شما معرفت پیشهاید، نه عاشقان معرفت.
معنای اصطلاحی در یونان باستان[ویرایش]
در یونان باستان آموزگاران فلسفه را سوفسطائی میگفتند. اینان از شهری به شهر دیگر میرفتند و جوانان را دور خود جمع کرده و در ازای حقالٌزحمه به تدریس میپرداختند. سوفسطائیان خطابت و جدل و دیگر فنونی را که برای موفقیتهای اجتماعی و سیاسی لازم بود، به شاگردانشان میآموختند.
سوفسطائیان به دلیل نگاه تاریخی به تاریخچهٔ ۵۰۰ سالهٔ گذشتهٔ فلسفه در یونان، به این سؤال اساسی برخورد کردند که: «چرا پس از گذشت این همه زمان، هنوز معیاری برای حقیقت مشخص نشده» و برای حقیقت ۳ حالت قائل شدند:
به این دلایل، آنها جزو کسانی بودند که به قسمت اعظم بحث معرفتشناسی، یعنی «امکان معرفت» پرداختند. در نتیجه سوفسطائیان، قائل به این امر شدند که بحث بر سر حق و حقیقت بیفایده است و بهتر است به رتوریک(Rhetoric) یا فن بیان و خطابه بپردازند. در اصل آنها معتقد بودند که حقیقت نسبی است. از آنجایی که خطابه و فن بیان در آن روزگار به دلایل:
بسیار مهم بود، آنها همیشه مشتریانی برای آموزش داشتند.
اما بهتدریج، بر اثر افراط برخی از این آموزگاران، این واژه معنای دیگری پیدا کرد. آنها به حقانیت و صدق و کذب ادعا کاری نداشتند؛ بلکه تنها میخواستند به شاگردانشان آموزش دهند که چطور باید در مناظرهها به هر صورت ممکن، حریف را مغلوب کرد.
در نتیجه، سوفسطائیان در تداول عامه به بیصداقتی فکری و سفسطهگری بدنام شدند. در این معنا، سوفسطائی به کسی میگفتند که با چربزبانی و مغلطه، از آنچه میدانست ناراست است، به قصد فریفتن دیگران دلیل میآورد و نتیجه میگرفت.
با این وجود بسیاری از بزرگان سوفسطائیان چون پروتاگوراس، تنها فیلسوفانی شکاک بودند که مفاهیم اولیهٔ معرفتشناسی را طرحریزی میکردند، و به هیچ وجه سوفسطائی در معنای سفسطهگر و فریبکار نبودند.
فرقهها و افکار[ویرایش]
اما جدا از شهرت سوفسطائیان به بیصداقتی فکری، افکار آنها ابعاد گستردهتری پیدا کرد. نه تنها نسبت به صدق و کذب مدعا و حقانیت فرد بیتفاوت شدند و اصالت را صرفاً به منکوب کردن طرف مقابل دادند؛ بلکه اصولاً حق و حقانیت را انکار کردند.
ابن حزم اندلسی در فِصَل گفتهاست:
در توضیح بیشتر میتوان فرقههای سوفسطائی را اینگونه معرفی کرد:
طایفهٔ عندیه که پیروان پروتاگوراس بودهاند میگفتند حقایق اشیاء تابع اعتقادند؛ یعنی اگر حقیقتی را تصدیق کنی، آن نزد تو حق است و اگر منکر آن شوی، در نزد تو حق نیست. انسان میزان هر چیز است و حقایق در نفسالامر ثبوتی ندارند.
به باور این گروه، هر انسانی ادراکات خاص خود را دارد و هیچ شخص دیگری نمیتواند واقعاً بفهمد که کدامیک از این ادراکات «حقیقت» دارد. جهان هستی دارای اصولی غایی نیست که بتوان کشفشان کرد.
این طایفه به هیچ چیزی اعتقاد ندارند. پیرهون، سوفسطائی مشهور میگوید: «ما نه به حس باید اعتقاد داشته باشیم و نه به عقل، بلکه باید بدون رای و بدون تمایل به جهتی باشیم و تأثیرناپذیر، هر امری را هرچه که باشد نباید تصدیق یا تکذیب نماییم بلکه باید آن را هم تصدیق و هم تکذیب کنیم یا نه تصدیق کنیم و نه تکذیب».
همچنین سوفسطائیان برای علم نظری و نفس تفکر کردن ارزشی قائل نبودند، بلکه هنر گذراندن معیشت و حفظ ظاهر را تعلیم میدادند و به عبارت دیگر به علم از جهتی که فایدهای در زندگی و معاش دارد نظر میکردند نه اینکه علم به تنهایی شرافتی داشته باشد، برعکس ارسطو که میگفته علم خودش خواستنی است به نظر سوفسطائی در هر جامعه اعمالی درست است که مردم به آن معتقد باشند اگر از او بپرسی که چرا این کار درست است در جواب خواهد گفت که چون مردم به آن اعتقاد دارند یعنی مبنا و معیاری را نمیشناسد که کارها را با آن بسنجد بلکه ملاک صحت یک عمل را منحصر در اعتقاد مردم میداند.
آنان قائل به اصالت بشر و امور بشری بودهاند و آدمی را از طریق صناعت و تربیت قادر به همه چیز میانگاشتهاند.
سوفسطائیان هنر واحدی را آموزش میدادهاند که همان سخنوری است و در یک دیدگاه معرفت شناختی اشتراک داشتند که همان شکاکیت است که بر اساس این دیدگاه معرفت فقط نسبت به فاعل شناسایی میتواند تحقق یابد. بخشی از تعلیم سخنوری این بود که به شاگردانشان یاد میدادند تا هر دو طرف یک مسئله را با موفقیت یکسان به اثبات برسانند همانطور که پروتاگوراس در این زمینه میگوید: «در مورد هر مسئله دو استدلال متقابل وجود دارد».
به نظر سوفسطائیان حقیقت جزئی و متغیر است نه کلی و ثابت. چراکه حقیقت برای هر شخص همان چیزی است که او را متقاعد میکند و کاملاً ممکن است کسی را قانع کرد که سیاه سفید است. از نظر سوفسطائیان میتوان به چیزی معتقد شد، ولی هرگز نمیتوان دربارهٔ چیزی معرفت داشت. در چنین جوٌی از آن معرفتشناسی حمایت میشود که مطابق آن، آنچه بر تو پایدار است برای تو هست و آنچه بر من پایدار میشود برای من هست؛ بنابراین هیچکس نباید با دیگری مخالفت کند چراکه برای هرکس حقیقت همان چیزی است که خودش به آن دست یافتهاست.
سوفسطائیان دارای مبنای انسان گرایی بودند به این معنی که قانون را قرارداد محض میدانستهاند قراردادی که انسانها آن را به وجود آوردهاند و میتوانند با توافق خود آن را تغییر دهند.
آنان میگفتند که قانون را بشر ابداع کرده، یعنی قانون امر طبیعی ضروری نیست بلکه امر امکانی اختیاری است و تاحدودی مصنوع بشر و تابع قصد و نیت اوست.
ابنسینا در مورد روش برخورد با سوفسطائیها مینویسد:
«از سوفسطائی میپرسیم که دربارهٔ انکار خودتان چه میگویید؟ آیا میدانید انکار شما حق است، یا باطل است یا شاکّید؟ اگر از روی علم خودشان به یکی از این امور سهگانه حکم کردند پس به حقّیّت اعتقادی اعتراف کردهاند خواه اینکه این اعتقاد، اعتقاد حقّیّت قولشان به انکار قول حق باشد، یا اعتقاد بطلان آن یا اعتقاد شکّ در آن، پس انکارشان حق را مطلقاً، ساقط است.
و اگر بگویند ما شک داریم، به آنان گفته میشود که آیا میدانید که شک دارید یا به شک خودتان انکار دارید، و آیا از گفتارها به چیز معینی علم دارید؟ پس اگر اعتراف کردند که شکاکند یا منکرند و به شئ معینی از اشیا عالمند، پس به علمی و حقی اعتراف دارند.
و اگر گفتند:ما ابداً چیزی را نمیفهمیم و نمیفهمیم که نمیفهمیم، و در همه چیزها حتی در وجود و عدم خودمان شاکّیم و در شکّ خودمان نیز شاکّیم و همه اشیا را انکار داریم حتی انکار به آنها را نیز انکار داریم، شاید از روی عناد زبانشان بدین حرفها گویا است؛ پس احتجاج با ایشان ساقط است و امید راه جستن از ایشان نیست.
پس چارهٔ ایشان جز این نیست که ایشان را تکلیف به دخول نار کرد زیرا که نار و لانار نزدشان یکی است و ایشان را کتک زد زیرا که اَلَم و لا اَلَم برایشان یکی است.»
پیوند به بیرون[ویرایش]
A sophist (Greek: σοφιστής, sophistes) was a specific kind of teacher in ancient Greece, in the fifth and fourth centuries BCE. Many sophists specialized in using the tools of philosophy and rhetoric, though other sophists taught subjects such as music, athletics, and mathematics. In general, they claimed to teach arete ("excellence" or "virtue", applied to various subject areas), predominantly to young statesmen and nobility.
The Greek σοφός (sophos), related to the noun σοφία (sophia), had the meaning "skilled" or "wise" since the time of the poet Homer and originally was used to describe anyone with expertise in a specific domain of knowledge or craft. For example, a charioteer, a sculptor, or a warrior could be described as sophoi in their occupations. Gradually, the word also came to denote general wisdom and especially wisdom about human affairs, for example, in politics, ethics, or household management. This was the meaning ascribed to the Greek Seven Sages of 7th and 6th century BCE (such as Solon and Thales), and it was the meaning that appears in the histories of Herodotus.
From the word σοφός (sophos) is derived the verb σοφίζω (sophizo), which means "to instruct or make learned", and in the passive voice means "to become or be wise", or "to be clever or skilled in a thing". From this verb is derived the noun σοφιστής (sophistes), which originally meant "a master of one's craft" but later came to mean "a prudent man" or "wise man". The word for "sophist" in various languages comes from sophistes.
The word "sophist" could be combined with other Greek words to form compounds. Examples include meteorosophist, which roughly translates to "expert in celestial phenomena"; gymnosophist (or "naked sophist", a word used to refer to Indian philosophers, deipnosophist or "dinner sophist" (as in the title of Athenaeus's Deipnosophistae), and iatrosophist, a type of physician in the later Roman period.
Few writings from and about the first sophists survive. The early sophists charged money in exchange for education and providing wisdom, and so were typically employed by wealthy people. This practice resulted in the condemnations made by Socrates through Plato in his dialogues, as well as by Xenophon in his Memorabilia and, somewhat controversially, by Aristotle. As a paid tutor to Alexander the Great, Aristotle could be accused of being a sophist. Aristotle did not actually accept payment from Philip, Alexander's father, but requested that Philip reconstruct Aristotle's home town of Stageira as payment, which Philip had destroyed in a previous campaign, terms which Philip accepted. James A. Herrick wrote: "In De Oratore, Cicero blames Plato for separating wisdom and eloquence in the philosopher's famous attack on the sophists in Gorgias." Through works such as these, sophists were portrayed as "specious" or "deceptive", hence the modern meaning of the term.
The classical tradition of rhetoric and composition refers more to philosophers such as Aristotle, Cicero, and Quintilian than to the sophists. Owing largely to the influence of Plato and Aristotle, philosophy came to be regarded as distinct from sophistry, the latter being regarded as specious and rhetorical, a practical discipline. Thus, by the time of the Roman Empire, a sophist was simply a teacher of rhetoric and a popular public speaker. For instance, Libanius, Himerius, Aelius Aristides, and Fronto were sophists in this sense. However, despite the opposition from philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, it is clear that sophists had a vast influence on a number of spheres, including the growth of knowledge and on ethical political theory. Their teachings had a huge influence on thought in the fifth century BCE. The sophists focused on the rational examination of human affairs and the betterment and success of human life. They argued that gods could not be the explanation of human action.
5th century BCE
In the second half of the 5th century BCE, particularly in Athens, "sophist" came to denote a class of mostly itinerant intellectuals who taught courses in various subjects, speculated about the nature of language and culture, and employed rhetoric to achieve their purposes, generally to persuade or convince others. "Sophists did, however, have one important thing in common: whatever else they did or did not claim to know, they characteristically had a great understanding of what words would entertain or impress or persuade an audience." Sophists went to Athens to teach because the city was flourishing at the time. It was good employment for those good at debate, which was a specialty of the first sophists, and they received the fame and fortune they were seeking. Protagoras is generally regarded as the first of these professional sophists. Others include Gorgias, Prodicus, Hippias, Thrasymachus, Lycophron, Callicles, Antiphon, and Cratylus. A few sophists claimed that they could find the answers to all questions. Most of these sophists are known today primarily through the writings of their opponents (particularly Plato and Aristotle), which makes it difficult to assemble an unbiased view of their practices and teachings. In some cases, such as Gorgias, original rhetorical works are extant, allowing the author to be judged on his own terms, but in most cases knowledge about what individual sophists wrote or said comes from fragmentary quotations that lack context and are usually hostile.
Sophists could be described both as teachers and philosophers, having traveled about in Greece teaching their students various life skills, particularly rhetoric and public speaking. These were useful qualities of the time, during which persuasive ability had a large influence on one's political power and economic wealth. Athens became the center of the sophists' activity, due to the city's freedom of speech for non-slave citizens and its wealth of resources. The sophists as a group had no set teachings, and they lectured on subjects that were as diverse as semantics and rhetoric, to ontology, and epistemology. Most sophists claimed to teach arête (“excellence” or “virtue”) in the management and administration of not only one’s affairs, but the city’s as well. Before the fifth century BCE, it was believed that aristocratic birth qualified a person for arête and politics. However, Protagoras, who is regarded as the first sophist, argued that arête was the result of training rather than birth.
1st century CE
From the late 1st century CE the Second Sophistic, a philosophical and rhetorical movement, was the chief expression of intellectual life. The term "Second Sophistic" comes from Philostratos, who rejecting the term "New Sophistic" traced the beginnings of the movement to the orator Aeschines in the 4th century BCE. But its earliest representative was really Nicetas of Smyrna, in the late 1st century CE. Unlike the original Sophistic movement of the 5th century BCE, the Second Sophistic was little concerned with politics. But it was, to a large degree, to meet the everyday needs and respond to the practical problems of Greco-Roman society. It came to dominate higher education and left its mark on many forms of literature. Lucian, himself a writer of the Second Sophistic, even calls Jesus "that crucified sophist". This article, however, only discusses the Sophists of Classical Greece.
Most of what is known about sophists comes from commentaries from others. In some cases, such as Gorgias, some of his works survive, allowing the author to be judged on his own terms. In one case, the Dissoi logoi, an important sophist text survived but knowledge of its author has been lost. However, most knowledge of sophist thought comes from fragmentary quotations that lack context. Many of these quotations come from Aristotle, who seems to have held the sophists in slight regard.
Protagoras was one of the best known and most successful sophists of his era; however, some later philosophers, such as Sextus Empiricus treat him as a founder of a philosophy rather than as a sophist. Protagoras taught his students the necessary skills and knowledge for a successful life, particularly in politics. He trained his pupils to argue from both points of view because he believed that truth could not be limited to just one side of the argument. Protagoras wrote about a variety of subjects and advanced several philosophical ideas, particularly in epistemology. Some fragments of his works have survived. He is the author of the famous saying, "Man is the measure of all things," which is the opening sentence of a work called Truth.
Gorgias was a well-known sophist whose writings showcased his ability to make counter-intuitive and unpopular positions appear stronger. Gorgias authored a lost work known as On the Non-Existent, which argues that nothing exists. In it, he attempts to persuade his readers that thought and existence are different. He also wrote Encomium of Helen in which he presents all of the possible reasons for which Helen could be blamed for causing the Trojan War and refutes each one of them.
Many sophists taught their skills for a price. Due to the importance of such skills in the litigious social life of Athens, practitioners often commanded very high fees. The sophists' practice of questioning the existence and roles of traditional deities and investigating into the nature of the heavens and the earth prompted a popular reaction against them. The attacks of some of their followers against Socrates prompted a vigorous condemnation from his followers, including Plato and Xenophon, as there was a popular view of Socrates as a sophist. For example, the comic playwright Aristophanes criticizes the sophists as hairsplitting wordsmiths, and makes Socrates their representative. Their attitude, coupled with the wealth garnered by many of the sophists, eventually led to popular resentment against sophist practitioners and the ideas and writings associated with sophism.
As only small portions of the sophists’ writings have survived they are mainly known through the works of Plato. Plato's dialogs present his generally hostile views on the sophists’ thought, due to which he is largely responsible for the modern view of the sophist as an avaricious instructor who teaches deception. Plato depicts Socrates as refuting some sophists in several of his dialogues, depicting sophists in an unflattering light. It is unclear how accurate or fair Plato's representation of them may be; however, Protagoras and Prodicus are portrayed in a largely positive light in Protagoras (dialogue).
The comic playwright Aristophanes, a contemporary of the sophists, criticized the sophists as hairsplitting wordsmiths. Aristophanes, however, made no distinction between sophists and philosophers, and showed either of them as willing to argue any position for the right fee. In his comedic play The Clouds, Strepsiades seeks the help of Socrates (a parody of the actual philosopher) in an effort to avoid paying his debts. In the play, Socrates promises to teach Strepsiades' son to argue his way out of paying his debts.
An ongoing debate is centered on the difference between the sophists, who charged for their services, and Socrates, who did not. Instead of giving instruction Socrates professed a self-effacing and questioning posture, exemplified by what is known as the Socratic method, although Diogenes Laërtius wrote that Protagoras—a sophist—invented this method.) Socrates' attitude towards the sophists was by not entirely oppositional. In one dialogue Socrates even stated that the sophists were better educators than he was, which he validated by sending one of his students to study under a sophist. W. K. C. Guthrie classified Socrates as a sophist in his History of Greek Philosophy.
Before Plato, the word "sophist" could be used as either a respectful or contemptuous title. It was in Plato’s dialogue, Sophist, that the first record of an attempt to answer the question “what is a sophist?” is made. Plato described sophists as paid hunters after the young and wealthy, as merchants of knowledge, as athletes in a contest of words, and purgers of souls. From Plato's assessment of sophists it could be concluded that sophists do not offer true knowledge, but only an opinion of things. Plato describes them as shadows of the true, saying, "...the art of contradiction making, descended from an insincere kind of conceited mimicry, of the semblance-making breed, derived from image making, distinguished as portion, not divine but human, of production, that presents, a shadow play of words—such are the blood and the lineage which can, with perfect truth, be assigned to the authentic sophist". Plato sought to distinguish sophists from philosophers, arguing that a sophist was a person who made his living through deception, whereas a philosopher was a lover of wisdom who sought the truth. To give the philosophers greater credence, Plato gave the sophists a negative connotation.
Plato depicts Socrates as refuting sophists in several dialogues. These texts often depict the sophists in an unflattering light, and it is unclear how accurate or fair Plato's representation of them may be; however, Protagoras and Prodicus are portrayed in a largely positive light in Protagoras (dialogue). Protagoras argued that "man is the measure of all things", meaning man decides for himself what he is going to believe. The works of Plato and Aristotle have had much influence on the modern view of the "sophist" as a greedy instructor who uses rhetorical sleight-of-hand and ambiguities of language in order to deceive, or to support fallacious reasoning. In this view, the sophist is not concerned with truth and justice, but instead seeks power.
Some scholars, such as Ugo Zilioli argue that the sophists held a relativistic view on cognition and knowledge. However, this may involve the Greek word "doxa", which means "culturally shared belief" rather than "individual opinion". The sophists' philosophy contains criticisms of religion, law, and ethics. Although many sophists were apparently as religious as their contemporaries, some held atheistic or agnostic views (for example, Protagoras and Diagoras of Melos).
The sophists' rhetorical techniques were useful for any young nobleman looking for public office. The societal roles the sophists filled had important ramifications for the Athenian political system. The historical context provides evidence for their considerable influence, as Athens became more and more democratic during the period in which the sophists were most active.
Even though Athens was already a flourishing democracy before their arrival, the cultural and psychological contributions of the sophists played an important role in the growth of Athenian democracy. Sophists contributed to the new democracy in part by espousing expertise in public deliberation, the foundation of decision-making, which allowed—and perhaps required—a tolerance of the beliefs of others. This liberal attitude would naturally have made its way into the Athenian assembly as sophists began acquiring increasingly high-powered clients. Continuous rhetorical training gave the citizens of Athens "the ability to create accounts of communal possibilities through persuasive speech". This was important for the democracy, as it gave disparate and sometimes superficially unattractive views a chance to be heard in the Athenian assembly.
In addition, sophists had a great impact on the early development of law, as the sophists were the first lawyers in the world. Their status as lawyers was a result of their highly developed skills in argument.
The sophists were the first formal teachers of the art of speaking and writing in the Western world. Their influence on education in general, and medical education in particular, has been described by Seamus Mac Suibhne. The sophists "offer quite a different epistemic field from that mapped by Aristotle", according to scholar Susan Jarratt, writer of Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured.
During the Second Sophistic, the Greek discipline of rhetoric heavily influenced Roman education. During this time Latin rhetorical studies were banned for the precedent of Greek rhetorical studies. In addition, Greek history was preferred for educating the Roman elites above that of their native Roman history.
Many rhetoricians during this period were instructed under specialists in Greek rhetorical studies as part of their standard education. Cicero, a prominent rhetorician during this period in Roman history, is one such example of the influence of the Second Sophistic on Roman education. His early life coincided with the suppression of Latin rhetoric in Roman education under the edicts of Crassus and Domitius. Cicero was instructed in Greek rhetoric throughout his youth, as well as in other subjects of the Roman rubric under Archias. Cicero benefited in his early education from favorable ties to Crassus.
In his writings, Cicero is said to have shown a "synthesis that he achieved between Greek and Roman culture" summed up in his work De Oratore. Despite his oratorical skill, Cicero pressed for a more liberal education in Roman instruction which focused more in the broad sciences including Roman history. He entitled this set of sciences as politior humanitas (2.72). Regardless of his efforts toward this end, Greek history was still preferred by the majority of aristocratic Romans during this time.
In modern usage, sophism, sophist and sophistry are used disparagingly. A sophism is a fallacious argument, especially one used deliberately to deceive. A sophist is a person who reasons with clever but fallacious and deceptive arguments.