پوشش صورت در امپراتوری بیزانس، یونان، روم رایج بود. در میان تمدنهای آشوریان، کلدانیان، سومریان، پاشها، بازیها، گوتیها، لولوبیان، کاسیها، سکایان، اورارتوها و کیمیریان زنان چهرهٔ خود را در برابر مردان بیگانه میپوشانیدند. در هندوستان، روبنده به اسم پرده خوانده میشد. ملکهها و اشراف هندوستان چهرهٔ خود را میپوشاندند. خدمتکارها در برابر دیدن چهرهٔ زنان تنبیه میشدند. هارشا، گانگایدوا و ریبیدوا نیز با پرده در میان جمع حرکت میکردند. در کتب مقدّس هندی مانند آلتکار و ایندرا پوشیدن ماندن چهرهٔ زنان اهمیت و تأکید خاصی دارد. در ترکستان، حجاب صورت پارچهای بوده که آن را به دور بخش پایین صورت میپیچیدهاند و بینی، لبها و چانه، و گونهها پوشیده میشدهاست. این گونه پوشش صورت در مجسمهای از آن دوره دیده میشود که اکنون در موزه لوور پاریس قرار دارد که در بندر غربی ترکیه کشف شده و قدمت آن به سیصد و پنجاه سال قبل از میلاد مسیح تخمین زده شدهاست(این مجسمه مربوط به مردم هیت است نه ترکها . ترکها از قرن 13دهم وارد ترکیه شدهاند ). در اسکندریه مصر نیز پوشش صورت ضروری شمرده میشدهاست.
در جهان اسلام[ویرایش]
روبنده در دوران امویان، خلافت عبّاسی و عثمانی هم چنان اهمیت داشت و در ایران پیش از قاجار نیز زنان با روبنده در اجتماع ظاهر میشدند و ولی بعد از قاجار فقط در استان هرمزگان و استان سیستان و بلوچستان از روبنده استفاده میشود. با قدرت گرفتن طالبان در افغانستان، زدن برقع و پوشاندن صورت در آن کشور برای زنان اجباری گردید. در عربستان سعودی نیز پوشاندن صورت برای زنان معمول است. در کشورهای عربی مانند کویت، امارات متحده عربی، یمن، بحرین، مصر، عراق -در کشورهای آسیایی چون اندونزی و کشورهای آفریقایی چون الجزایر، لیبی، غنا و نیجریه نیز استفاده از روبنده در بین زنان مسلمان رایج است. در انتخابات مجلس فلسطین در سال ۲۰۰۶، نمایندگان زن حزب حماس همگی روبنده داشتند. در کشورهای اسلامی تونس و ترکیه استفاده از روبنده ممنوع است. در مصر و امارات متحده عربی رانندگی برای زنان با روبنده ممنوع گشتهاست.
در بین کتب زردشتی، ارداویرافنامه پوشش صورت زنان را پسندیده دانستهاست و چهرهنمایی زنان را علّت گمراهی مردان میداند. در شاهنامه فردوسی چندین بار لغت پوشیدهرخ یا پوشیدهروی مترادف واژهٔ دختر به کار رفتهاست. شاهنامهشناس معاصر، پورخالقی چترودی، این علّت را بیانگر این واقعیت میداند که از نظر فردوسی زنان در دورهٔ کیانیان، اشکانیان، و ساسانیان از روبنده استفاده میکردند.
با استناد به تورات و تنخ یهودی، میتوان دریافت که پوشانیدن چهره در میان زنان عبرانی و دیگر زنان یهودی رایج بودهاست. ساره و قطوره همسر ابراهیم، ربه کا زن اسحاق، راحیل و لیه همسران یعقوب، صپوراه همسر موسی و استر همسر خشایارشا با چهرهٔ پوشیده در میان مردم حاضر میشدند. بر اساس کتاب روت، همسر بوعز نیز چهره خود را میپوشانیدهاست. در کتاب اشعیا، به فرستاده شدن عذاب بر دختران صهیون به دلیل چهرهآرایی در برابر بیگانگان اشاره رفتهاست. در تورات برای اشاره به روبنده، واژههایی چون صفه و مسّکه به کار رفتهاست.
با این حال شواهدی از تورات نیز وجود دارد که نشان میدهد رسم پوشیدن چهره، در بین عبرانیان فراگیر نبودهاست. در شولحان عاروخ، پوشانیدن چهره لازم دانسته نشدهاست، هرچند این کار سنت زنان پاکدامن دانسته شدهاست.
در قرآن، هیچ اشاره صریحی به پوشش صورت نشدهاست.
در نزد اهلسنت[ویرایش]
در میانِ علمایِ اهلسنت دربارهٔ پوشانیدن چهره اختلافنظر وجود دارد. آراء مذاهب اربعه به اختصار چنین است:
در برخی کتب حدیث اهل تسنن، احادیثی آمدهاست که بر اساس آن صحابیات و از آن جمله فاطمه زهرا، فاطمه بنت مره، عاتکه، عایشه، اسماء بنت عمیس، حفصه و امخالد چهره خود را میپوشانیدهاند. از صحابه و تابعین از جمله از ابنجریر، عبدالله بن مسعود، ابوعبیده السلمانی و محمد بن سیرین نیز احادیثی نقل شدهاست که برخی از آن به وجوب نقاب استدلال کردهاند.
عبدالعزیز بن باز، ابن تیمیه، محمّد صالح المنجّد، رشید احمد لوضیانوی، ابن المعزّ، ابن المنذر، ابن حجر عسقلانی، محمود الصیّاح، ابوبکر جصاص، محمد قاضی بیدوی، ابوبکر مختار الزین، ابن عثیمین، جمال ضرابزی، عبدالعزیز آلالشیخ، صالح الفوزانی و عثمان الهیاجی از علمای اهل سنت هستند که پوشانیدن چهره زنان را واجب میدانند. جمعیت علمای کشورهای آفریقایی، جمعیت علمای پاکستان، دانشگاه اسلامی امالقری نیز پوشاندن چهره را لازم و گشودن آن را حرام دانستهاند.
در مقابل ایسنا (انجمن اسلامی آمریکای شمالی)، جمعیت علمای دانشگاه اسلامی الازهر در قاهره مصر پوشاندن صورت زنان را مستحب دانستهاند. شیخ یوسف القرضاوی و عبید عاطف الزین نیز پوشاندن چهره را برای زنان مستحب میدانند. برخی از علمایِ اهل سنت نیز نقاب را مسئلهای فرهنگی و مربوط به آداب و رسوم (و نه لزوماً شرعی و دینی) میدانند؛ محمد سید طنطاووی رئیسِ پیشین الأزهر چنین رأئی را اظهار کردهاست.
در نزد شیعه[ویرایش]
در روایات و احادیث شیعه، بازگذاشتن چهره زن و نمایاندن آن به مرد نامحرم جایز دانسته شدهاست؛ مگر در شرایط خاصی که بیم فتنه برود.
در بین علمای شیعه معاصر، آیتالله روحالله خمینی، آیتالله علی خامنهای، آیتالله علی حسینی سیستانی، پوشاندن چهره را مستحب میدانند، هر چند ایشان در شرایط خاصی که بیم فتنهاست، پوشاندن صورت را لازم شمردهاند. مرتضی مطهری، پس از انقلاب اسلامی ایران، روبنده را از حجابهای غیر اسلامی دانست و این که به عقیدهٔ او آیهٔ پوشش، هرگز پوشاندن صورت را لازم نشمردهاست. آیتالله فاضل لنکرانی، زنجانی و بهجت زدن روبنده را جایز شمردهاند. اما اخباریان و اهل حدیث روبنده را لازم بلکه واجب دانستند. مانند آیتالله سید حسین عرب باغی رساله در این باره دارند که نام رساله ایشان رساله اساس الایمان در وجوب حجاب بر زنان که مطبوع گشته است. ناصر مکارم شیرازی، مرجع تقلید شیعه در پاسخ به استفتائی دربارهٔ استفاده از روبنده میگوید :
آیت الله خامنه ای در این باره معتقد است :
پوشیه زدن در محیطی که کمتر مورد استفاده قرار میگیرد، مصداق لباس شهرت نیست و از لحاظ شرعی اشکالی ندارد [ 1 ]
1: آیتالله خامنه ای، جزوه پوشش و نگاه جامعه الزهرا(سلام الله علیها)،ص 95
نقاب در غرب[ویرایش]
بعضی از دولتهای غربی برای زنانی که خواستار پوشانیدن چهرهشان هستند، محدودیتهایی ایجاد کردهاند. در سال ۲۰۰۱ هلند، استفاده از روبنده در مدارس و آموزشگاهها و محیطهای پژوهشی و اداری را ممنوع کرد. در آوریل ۲۰۰۶ دو دانش آموز دختر از مدرسه ریزریتل در بن آلمان به علت پوشیدن برقع اخراج شدند. دادگاه نیوزیلند در سال ۲۰۰۵ حکم صادر کرد که بر اساس آن زنان نمیتوانند هنگام شهادت در دادگاهها صورت خود را بپوشانند. در ایتالیا، پوشاندن صورت از سال ۱۹۷۵ ممنوع شد و در سال ۲۰۰۵ بر میزان جریمهٔ نقدی متخلفین افزوده شد. در فرانسه از سال ۱۹۸۰ پوشاندن صورت ممنوع گشت. کانادا در سال ۲۰۰۱ اعلام کرد که زنان نیز میبایست برای گرفتن گواهینامه رانندگی، چهره خود را بگشایند. سلطانه فریمن بر حق خود برای داشتن عکس با نقاب در گواهینامه رانندگی اصرار کرد و موفق شد ایالت فلوریدا را جریمه کند. در انگلستان، در سال ۲۰۰۶جک استرا، نماینده مجلس عوام بلاکبرن، گفت که از صحبت کردن با کسی که نمیتواند صورت او را ببیند، راحت نیست و به نظر وی زدن روبنده بر چهره باعث تشدید حس جدایی و انزواطلبی میشود. الیور لتوین، مدیر سیاستگزاری حزب، این توصیه را سخنی خطرناک در مورد جلوگیری از حق افراد در انتخاب پوشش دانست. در آوریل همان سال، عایشه اعظمی دستیار آموزشی مسلمان که به دلیل امتناع از برداشتن روبنده خود در داخل کلاس از کار معلق شده بود، از دبستانی در یورکشایر غربی شمال انگلستان اخراج گردید. به گفته عایشهٔ اعظمی، دانش آموزان این مدرسه از وضعیت روبنده وی هرگز شکایتی نداشتهاند. نیک ویتینگهام، وکیل عایشه اعظمی گفتهاست که موکل وی قادر به انجام شغل خود به عنوان دستیار آموزشی است و میتواند از دانش آموزانی که زبان انگلیسی، زبان دوم آنها است، حمایت و پشتیبانی کند. در ایالت کبک در کانادا، زنان مسلمان برای رأی دادن میبایست چهره خود را آشکار کنند. یک روحانی ارشد کلیسای کاتولیک رم ایتالیا در اظهار نظری، کنار گذاشتن روبنده زنان مسلمان را در اروپا خواستار شد.کاردینال رناتو مارتینی، مسوول امور فرهنگی مهاجران در واتیکان که به مناسبت انتشار بیانیه پاپ بندیکت شانزدهم در مورد لزوم وضع قوانینی برای بهبود شرایط مهاجران اروپایی سخن میگفت، به زنان مسلمان توصیه کرد که به منظور رعایت آداب و رسوم، قوانین و نمادها و دین کشورهای میزبان خود، کنار گذاشتن روبنده را مورد توجه قرار دهند. در سال ۲۰۰۰، سوئد قانونی را به تصویب رساند که بر اساس آن ماموران پلیس حق دارند از زنانی که نقاب بر چهره دارند بخواهند برای تشخیص هویت، نقاب و روبندهٔ خود را بردارند. در استرالیا پلیس حق دارد که روبنده زنان را بردارد و در صورت رو به رو شدن با مقاوت پلیس میتواند آنان را بازداشت کند با این حال زنان مسلمان در ایالات متحده آمریکا برای زدن روبنده و پوشاندن صورت آزادی بیشتری دارند.
روبنده در کشورهای مختلف شکل و نوع متفاوتی دارد. «نقاب کامل» تمام صورت از جمله چشمها را میپوشاند. «نقاب درزدار» دو سوراخ برای چشمها دارد و جز چشمها تمام صورت را میپوشاند. نیم نقاب که از زیر چشمها به پشت بسته میشود و پیشانی، ابروها، و چشم را نمایان میسازد. «نقاب لوانی» که به دور صورت بسته میشود و علاوه بر پیشانی و چشم، بینی را نیز آشکار میسازد. برخی از نقابها، یک یا چند پارچهٔ نیم شفاف را روی چشم قرار میدهد که علاوه بر پوشیده ماندن چشم، زن بتواند به راحتی ببیند و به اختیار بردارد. نوع دیگری از روبنده، برقع است که در افغانستان و پاکستان رواج دارد و پوششی از سر تا پا است و چشمها معمولاً پشت یک پرده مشبّک قرار میگیرند. در پاکستان، پاک چدری، در هند ریجان، و در ایران پوشیه و برقع پوششهایی هستند که صورت را میپوشانند.
A niqāb or niqaab (//; Arabic: نِقاب niqāb, "[face] veil"), also called a ruband, is a garment of clothing that covers the face, worn by some Muslim women as a part of a particular interpretation of hijab (modest dress). According to the majority of Muslim scholars and Islamic schools of thought, face veiling is a requirement of Islam; however a minority of Muslim scholars assert that women are not required to cover their face in public. Those Muslim women who wear the niqab do so in places where they may encounter non-mahram (non-related) men.
The face veil pre-dates Islam, and had been used by certain Arabian pre-Islamic cultures. Culturally, it is "a custom imported from Najd, a region in Saudi Arabia and the power base of its Salafi fundamentalist form of Islam. Within Muslim countries it is very contested and considered fringe."
Today, the niqab is most often worn in its region of origin: the Arab countries of the Arabian Peninsula — Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. However, even in these countries, the niqab is neither a universal cultural custom nor is it culturally compulsory. In other parts of the Muslim world outside of the Arabian Peninsula, where the niqab has slowly spread to a much smaller extent, it is regarded warily by Sunni and non-Sunni Muslims alike "as a symbol of encroaching fundamentalism." Nevertheless, the niqab is worn by a small minority of Muslims in not only Muslim-majority regions such as Somalia, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, the Palestinian territories, and some Iranian Arabs, but also among a minority of Muslims in regions where Muslims are themselves a minority, like India and Europe.
The terms niqab and burqa are often conflated; a niqab covers the face while leaving the eyes uncovered, while a burqa covers the entire body from the top of the head to the ground, with only a mesh screen allowing the wearer to see in front of her.
Use of the term in Arabic
Women who wear the niqab are often called niqābīah; this word is used both as a noun and as an adjective. However, the more correct form grammatically is منتقبة muntaqabah / muntaqibah (plural muntaqabāt / muntaqibāt) but niqābīah is used in an affectionate manner (much as with ḥijābīah versus محجبة muḥajjabah). Women in niqab are also called منقبة munaqqabah, with the plural منقبات munaqqabāt.
Pre-Islamic use of face veils
Various types of face veils have been in use since pre-Islamic times.
Face veiling in Islam
Most Islamic scholars and most contemporary Islamic jurists have agreed that women are required to cover their face, though a number of scholars consider it to be highly recommended but not compulsory. There exist a number of reasons why women may cover their face in public, and this practice must be understood within a particular social context.
Criminalization and bans
The niqab is controversial in Europe, Australia, New Zealand and North America. In France specifically, although the niqab is not individually targeted, it falls within the scope of legislation which bans the wearing of any religious items (Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or other) in certain public areas.
In 2004, the French Parliament passed a law to regulate "the wearing of symbols indicating religious affiliation in public educational establishments". This law forbids all emblems that outwardly express a specific religious belief to be worn in French public schools. This law was proposed because the Stasi Commission, a committee that is supposed to enforce secularity in French society, was forced to deal with frequent disputes about headscarves in French public schools, as outsiders of the practice did not understand the scarves’ purpose and therefore felt uncomfortable.
Although the French law addresses other religious symbols – not just Islamic headscarves and face coverings – the international debate has been centered around the impact it has on Muslims because of the growing population in Europe, especially France, and the increase in Islamophobia.
In July 2010, the National Assembly in France passed Loi Interdisant La Dissimulation Du Visage Dans L'espace Public, (Act Prohibiting Concealment of the Face in Public Space). This act outlawed the wearing of clothing that covers one's face in any public space. Violators of the ban on veils and coverings are liable to fines of up to 150 euros and mandatory classes on French citizenship. Anyone found to have forced a woman to wear a religious covering faces up to two years in prison as well as a 60,000 euro fine.
The then president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy publicly stated "The burqa is not welcome in France because it is contrary to our values and the ideals we have of a woman's dignity". Sarkozy further explained that the French government sees these enactments as a way to successfully ease Muslims into French society and to promote gender equality.
In October 2018, the United Nations Human Rights Committee declared that France's ban disproportionately harmed the right of women to manifest their religious beliefs, and could have the effects of "confining them to their homes, impeding their access to public services and marginalizing them."
There are many styles of niqab and other facial veils worn by Muslim women around the world. The two most common forms are the half niqab and the gulf-style or full niqab.
The half niqab is a simple length of fabric with elastic or ties and is worn around the face. This garment typically leaves the eyes and part of the forehead visible.
The gulf-style or full niqab completely covers the face. It consists of an upper band that is tied around the forehead, together with a long wide piece of fabric which covers the face, leaving an opening for the eyes. Many full niqab have two or more sheer layers attached to the upper band, which can be worn flipped down to cover the eyes or left over the top of the head. While a person looking at a woman wearing a niqab with an eyeveil would not be able to see her eyes, the woman wearing the niqab would be able to see out through the thin fabric.
Other less common and more cultural or national forms of niqab include the Afghan style burqa, a long pleated gown that extends from the head to the feet with a small crocheted grille over the face. The Pak Chador is a relatively new style from Pakistan, which consists of a large triangular scarf with two additional pieces. A thin band on one edge is tied behind the head so as to keep the chador on, and then another larger rectangular piece is attached to one end of the triangle and is worn over the face, and the simple hijāb wrapped, pinned or tied in a certain way so as to cover the wearer's face.
Other common styles of clothing popularly worn with a niqab in Western countries include the khimar, a semi-circular flare of fabric with an opening for the face and a small triangular underscarf. A khimar is usually bust-level or longer, and can also be worn without the niqab. It is considered a fairly easy form of headscarf to wear, as there are no pins or fasteners; it is simply pulled over the head. Gloves are also sometimes worn with the niqab, because many munaqqabāt believe no part of the skin should be visible other than the area immediately around the eyes or because they do not want to be put in a position where they would touch the hand of an unrelated man (for instance, when accepting change from a cashier). Most munaqqabāt also wear an overgarment (jilbab, abaya etc.) over their clothing, though some munaqabat in Western countries wear a long, loose tunic and skirt instead of a one-piece overgarment.
In different countries
The niqab in Egypt has a complex and long history. On 8 October 2009, Egypt's top Islamic school and the world's leading school of Sunni Islam, Al-Azhar, banned the wearing of the niqab in classrooms and dormitories of all its affiliate schools and educational institutes.
The niqab was traditionally worn in Southern Iran from the arrival of Islam until the end of the Qajar era. There were many regional variations of niqab, which were also called ruband or pushiye. Traditionally, Iranian women wore chadors long before Islam arrived.
The 20th century ruler, Reza Shah, banned all variations of face veil in 1936, as incompatible with his modernistic ambitions. Reza Shah ordered the police to arrest women who wore the niqab and to remove their face veils by force. This policy outraged the clerics who believed it was obligatory for women to cover their faces. Many women gathered at the Goharshad Mosque in Mashhad with their faces covered to show their objection to the niqab ban.
Between 1941 and 1979 wearing the niqab was no longer against the law, but it was considered by the government to be a "badge of backwardness." During these years, wearing the niqab and chador became much less common and instead most religious women wore headscarves only. Fashionable hotels and restaurants refused to admit women wearing niqabs. High schools and universities actively discouraged or even banned the niqab, though the headscarf was tolerated.
After the new government of 'Islamic Republic' was established, the niqab ban was not enforced by officials.
In modern Iran, the wearing of niqab is not common and is only worn by certain ethnic minorities and a minority of Arab Muslims in the southern Iranian coastal cities, such as Bandar Abbas, Minab and Bushehr. Some women in the Arab-populated province of Khuzestan still wear niqab.
Saudi women are not required by a secular law to wear the niqab. However, the niqab is an important part of Saudi culture and in most Saudi cities (including Riyadh, Mecca, Medina, Abha, etc.) the vast majority of women cover their faces. The Saudi niqab usually leaves a long open slot for the eyes; the slot is held together by a string or narrow strip of cloth. In 2008, the Mohammad Habadan, a religious authority in Mecca, reportedly called on women to wear veils that reveal only one eye, so that women would not be encouraged to use eye make-up.
1,200 niqab-wearing teachers were transferred to administrative duties in the summer of 2010 in Syria because the face veil was undermining the secular policies followed by the state as far as education is concerned. In the summer of 2010, students wearing the niqab were prohibited from registering for university classes. The ban was associated with a move by the Syrian government to re-affirm Syria's traditional secular atmosphere.
On 6 April 2011 it was reported that teachers would be allowed to once again wear the niqab.
Acceptance of the niqab is not universal in Yemen. A senior member of the Al-Islah political party, Tawakel Karman, removed her niqab at a human rights conference in 2004 and since then has called for "other women and female activists to take theirs off".
Enforcement, encouragement and bans
The niqab is outlawed in Azerbaijan, where the overwhelming majority of the population is Muslim. Niqabi women, just like women wearing hijab, cannot work as public servants, neither can they continue studies at schools, including the private schools. Although there is no single law banning niqab at private companies, it would be nearly impossible for a niqabi woman to find work.
In February 2010, an Arab country's unnamed ambassador to Dubai had his marriage annulled after discovering that his bride was cross-eyed and had facial hair. The woman had worn a niqab on the occasions that the couple had met prior to the wedding. The ambassador informed the Sharia court that he had been deliberately deceived by the bride's mother, who had shown him photographs of the bride's sister. He only discovered this when he lifted the niqab to kiss his bride. The court annulled the marriage, but refused a claim for compensation.
Sultaana Freeman gained national attention in 2003 when she sued the US state of Florida for the right to wear a niqab for her driver's license photo. However, a Florida circuit court ruled there was no violation in the state requiring her to show her face to a camera in a private room with only a female employee to take the picture, in exchange for the privilege of driving. The ruling was affirmed by the appellate court.
One female non-Muslim student at Eastern Michigan University spent a semester in 2005 wearing a niqab for a class project (she referred to the face veil as a "burqa").[clarification needed] Her stated experiences, such as her own feeling as if no one wanted to be near her, led her to assert that conservative Muslim dress is disapproved of in the United States.
In 2006, Female candidates from the Hamas party campaigned during the Palestinian Authority parliamentary elections, wearing niqabs. Since Hamas seized control of Gaza from Fatah during the Battle of Gaza (2007), Muslim women in Gaza have been wearing, or were mandated to wear, niqabs in increasingly large numbers
In July 2015, Cameroon banned the face veil including the burqa after two women dressed in the religious garments completed a suicide attack killing 13. This was also done in order to counter extremism in public and places of work.
Republic of the Congo
In May 2015, the Republic of the Congo banned the face veil in order to counter extremism. The decision was announced by El Hadji Djibril Bopaka, the president of the country's Islamic High Council.
The Moroccan government distributed letters to businesses on 9 January 2017 declaring a ban on the burka. The letters indicated the "sale, production and import" or the garment were prohibited and businesses were expected to clear their stock within 48 hours.
In July 2019, wearing the niqab was banned in government buildings. The ban came after the capital Tunis was attacked by three suicide bombings in seven days.
In 2017 the government of Tajikistan passed a law requiring people to "stick to traditional national clothes and culture", which has been widely seen as an attempt to prevent women from wearing traditional Islamic clothing, in particular the style of headscarf wrapped under the chin, in contrast to the traditional Tajik headscarf tied behind the head.
In autumn 2017, the Danish parliament (Danish: Folketinget) agreed to adopt a law prohibiting people to wear "attire and clothing masking the face in such a way that it impairs recognizability". A full ban on both niqabs and burqas was announced on 31 May 2018. The ban came into force on 1 August 2018 and carries a fine of 1000 DKK, about 134 euro, by repeat offending the fine may reach 10 000 DKK. Then targets all garments that covers the face, such as fake beards or balaclavas. Supporters of the ban claim that the ban facilitates integration of Muslims into Danish society while Amnesty International claimed the ban violated women's rights. A protest numbering 300-400 people was held in the Nørrebro district of Copenhagen organised by Socialist Youth Front, Kvinder i Dialog and Party Rebels.
The first fine was issued in Hørsholm in August 2018 to a woman dressed in a niqab who was in a fistfight with another woman on an escalator in a shopping centre. During the fight, her face-covering veil fell off, but as police approached, she put it on again and police issued the fine. Both women were suspected of public order violations.
In 2012 in Norway, a professor at the University of Tromsø denied a student's use of niqab in the classroom. The professor claimed Norway's parliament granted each teacher the right to deny the use of niqab in his/her classroom. Clothing that covers the face, such as a niqab, is prohibited in some schools and municipalities.
In autumn 2017, Norway government adopted a law prohibiting people to wear "attire and clothing masking the face in such a way that it impairs recognizability" in schools and in universities.
The Prime Minister of Norway Erna Solberg stated in an interview that in Norwegian work environments it is essential to see each other's faces and therefore anyone who insists on wearing a niqab is in practice unemployable. Solberg also views the wearing of the niqab as a challenge to social boundaries in the Norwegian society, a challenge that would be countered by Norway setting boundaries of its own. Solberg also stated that anyone may wear what they wish in their spare time and that her comments applied to professional life but that any immigrant has the obligation to adapt to Norwegian work life and culture.
In June 2018, the parliament of Norway passed a bill banning clothing covering the face at educational institutions as well as daycare centres, which included face-covering Islamic veils. The prohibition applies to pupils and staff alike.
In 2012, a poll by Uppsala University found that Swedes believed that face-covering Islamic veils are either completely unacceptable or fairly unacceptable, 85% for the burqa and 81% for the niqāb. The researchers noted these figures represented a compact resistance to the face-covering veil by the population of Sweden.
In the United Kingdom, comments by Jack Straw, MP started a national debate over the wearing of the "veil" (niqab), in October 2006. Around that time there was media coverage of the case of Aishah Azmi, a teaching assistant in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, who lost her appeal against suspension from her job for wearing the niqab while teaching English to young children. It was decided that being unable to see her face prevented the children from learning effectively. Azmi, who had been interviewed and hired for the position without the niqab, allegedly on her husband's advice, argued it was helping the children understand different people's beliefs. In 2010, a man committed a bank robbery wearing a niqab as a disguise.
In Italy, a law issued in 1975 strictly forbids wearing any attire in public that could hide the face of a person. Penalties (fines and imprisonment) are provided for such behaviour. The original purpose of the anti-mask law was to prevent crime or terrorism. The law allows for exemptions for a "justified cause", which has sometimes been interpreted by courts as including religious reasons for wearing a veil, but others –including local governments– disagree and claim religion is not a "justified cause" in this context.
On 29 April 2010, the Belgian Chamber of Representatives adopted a law prohibiting people to wear "attire and clothing masking the face in such a way that it impairs recognizability". The penalty for violating this directive can run from up to 14 days imprisonment and a 250 euro fine.
In August 2014, the Chief of Protocol for the city of Brussels Jean-Marie Pire tore the niqab off a Qatari princess who had asked him for directions in Brussels. On 11 July 2017 the ban in Belgium was upheld by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) after having been challenged by two Muslim women who claimed their rights had been infringed.
On 13 July 2010 France's lower house of parliament overwhelmingly approved a ban on wearing burqa-style Islamic veils. The legislation forbids face-covering Muslim veils in all public places in France and calls for fines or citizenship classes, or both. The bill also is aimed at husbands and fathers — anyone convicted of forcing someone else to wear the garb risks a year of prison and a fine, with both penalties, doubled if the victim is a minor.
In 2017, a legal a ban on face-covering clothing for soldiers and state workers during work was approved by German parliament. Also in 2017, a legal ban on face-covering clothing for car and truck drivers was approved by German Ministry of Traffic.
In July 2017, German state Bavaria approved a legal ban on face-covering clothing for teachers, state workers and students at university and schools. In August 2017, the state of Lower Saxony (German: Niedersachsen) banned the burqa along with the niqab in public schools. This change in the law was prompted by a Muslim pupil in Osnabrück who wore the garment to school for years and refused to take it off. Since she has completed her schooling, the law was instituted to prevent similar cases in the future.
In 2007, the government of the Netherlands planned a legal ban on face-covering Islamic clothing, popularly described as the 'burqa ban', which included the niqab. In 2015, a partial ban of the niqab and burqa were approved by the Dutch government. The parliament still had to approve the measure. In November 2016, the legal ban on face-covering was approved by parliament. On 26 June 2018, a partial ban on face covering (including niqabs) on public transport and in buildings and associated yards of educational institutions, governmental institutions and healthcare institutions was enacted, with a number of exceptions.
In September 2018, a ban on face-covering veils was approved with a 67% vote in favour in the canton of St Gallen. The largest Islamic community organisation in Switzerland, the Islamic Central Council, recommended that Muslim women continue to cover their faces.
The niqab is banned in the Canadian province of Quebec in all publicly funded services. Persons cannot receive public service or provide public service with their faces covered. This includes public transportation, hospitals, and courts amongst others. On 18 October 2017, Bill 62 passed into law after a 66-51 vote in the Quebec National Assembly. The new law is entitled "An Act to foster adherence to State religious neutrality and, in particular, to provide a framework for requests for accommodation on religious grounds in certain bodies". However, regulations regarding the ban's implementation, and religious accommodations, are not expected until July 2018.
On 16 November 2015 the first act of Canada's newly appointed Minister of Justice and Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould was to assure women who chose to wear the niqāb during the Oath of Allegiance of their right to do so. In December 2011 then-Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney announced a policy directive from the Federal Government under then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper that Muslim women must remove niqābs throughout the citizenship ceremony where they declare their Oath of Allegiance. Zunera Ishaq, a Sunni Muslim woman living in Mississauga, Ontario, challenged and won the niqāb ban in the case of Canada v Ishaq on 5 October 2015. The Federal Court of Appeal decision in her favour was seen by some as "an opportunity to revisit the rules governing the somewhat difficult relationship between law and policy." In October 2015 Harper had appealed the Supreme Court of Canada to take up the case. With the election of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on 19 October 2015, the niqāb debate was settled as the Liberal government chose to not "politicize the issue any further." Minister Wilson-Raybould, who is the first Indigenous person to be named as Justice Minister, explained as she withdrew Harper's appeal to the Supreme Court, "In all of our policy as a government we will ensure that we respect the values that make us Canadians, those of diversity, inclusion and respect for those fundamental values." The Justice Minister spoke with Zunera by telephone to tell her the news prior to making her official announcement.
Elections Canada, the agency responsible for elections and referenda, stated that Muslim women can cover their faces while voting. The decision was criticized by the Conservative Party of Canada, Bloc Québécois, and Liberal Party of Canada. The New Democrats were not opposed to the decision. The Conservative federal Cabinet had introduced legislation to parliament that would bar citizens from voting if they arrived at polling stations with a veiled face.
The niqāb became an issue in the 2007 election in Quebec after it became public knowledge that women wearing the niqāb were allowed to vote under the same rules as electors who did not present photo identification (ID); namely, by sworn oath in the presence of a third party who could vouch for their identity. The chief electoral officer received complaints that this policy was too accommodating of cultural minorities (a major theme in the election) and thereafter required accompaniment by bodyguards due to threatening telephone calls. All three major Quebec political parties were against the policy, with the Parti Québécois and Action démocratique du Québec vying for position as most opposed. The policy was soon changed to require all voters to show their face, even if they did not carry photo ID. However, Quebec residents who wear the niqāb stated they were not opposed to showing their faces for official purposes, such as voting. Salam Elmenyawi of the Muslim Council of Montreal estimated that only 10 to 15 Muslim voters in the province wear the niqāb and, since their veils have become controversial, most would probably not vote.
In October 2009, the Muslim Canadian Congress called for a ban on burqa and niqāb, saying that they have "no basis in Islam". Spokesperson Farzana Hassan cited public safety issues, such as identity concealment, as well as gender equality, stating that wearing the burqa and niqāb is "a practice that marginalizes women."
In 2002, Sultaana Freeman (formerly Sandra Keller, who converted to Islam in 1997 when marrying a Muslim man), sued the U.S. state of Florida for the right to wear a niqab for her driver's license photo. However, a Florida appellate court ruled that there was no violation in the state requiring her to show her face to a camera in a private room with only a female employee to take the picture, in exchange for the privilege of driving. The prevailing view in Florida is currently that hiding one's face on a form of photo identification defeats the purpose of having the picture taken, although 15 other states (including Arkansas, California, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, and Louisiana) have provisions that allow for driver's licenses absent of an identifying photograph in order to accommodate individuals who may have a religious reason to not have a photograph taken. In 2012, a string of armed robberies in Philadelphia were committed by people disguised in traditional Islamic woman's garb; Muslim leaders were concerned that the use of the disguises could put Muslim women in danger of hate crimes and inflame ethnic tensions.
In May 2010, an armed robbery committed by a man wearing a face veil and sunglasses raised calls to ban the Islamic veil; a request for new legislation was dismissed by both Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Liberal leader Tony Abbott.