تربیت معلم

از ویکی‌پدیا، دانشنامهٔ آزاد
پرش به: ناوبری، جستجو
فارسیEnglish

مختصات: ۳۵°۴۲′۱۶.۱۲″ شمالی ۵۱°۲۵′۳۶.۳″ شرقی / ۳۵.۷۰۴۴۷۷۸° شمالی ۵۱.۴۲۶۷۵۰° شرقی / 35.7044778; 51.426750 تربیت معلم به نوعی مرکز آموزش عالی گفته می‌شود که هدف آن تربیت و پرورش آموزگار برای سطوح مختف آموزشی از دبستان تا دبیرستان است. در ایران مراکز تربیت معلم متعددی برای تربیت معلمان مقاطع ابتدایی، راهنمایی و تربیت دبیر برای دبیرستان‌ها و هنرستان‌ها وجود داشت که در قالب دانشگاه فرهنگیان و دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی متمرکز شدند. به افراد پذیرفته شده و شاغل به تحصیل در تربیت معلم، حقوق دانشجویی داده می‌شود.[۱] سازمان مرکزی این دانشگاه، در تهران مستقر بوده و ۳۲ پردیس برادران و ۳۲ پردیس خواهران در استان‌ها (۳۱ استان و یک مرکز برای شهرستان‌های استان تهران) راه‌اندازی شده‌اند.[۱]

تاریخچه تربیت معلم در ایران[ویرایش]

در ایران، نخستین مرکز تربیت معلم در سال ۱۲۹۸ خورشیدی به نام دارالمعلمین مرکزی به ریاست ابوالحسن فروغی تأسیس شد. در سال ۱۳۹۰ دانشگاه فرهنگیان تاسیس شد و از سال ۱۳۹۱ شروع به کار کرد.

تاریخچه تربیت معلم در خارج[ویرایش]

آموزش معلمان تا پیش از آغاز عصر نوین مردم سالاری و قرون ۱۷ و ۱۸ میلادی مورد غفلت بود. اوّلین مؤسسه‌ای که برنامه منظم آموزش معلمان را ارائه می‌کرد مؤسسه برادران مسیحی بود که در سال ۱۶۸۵ به وسیله دو کشیش فرانسوی به نامهای دلاسال و جان بابیتیس تأسیس شد.

برنامه درسی[ویرایش]

برنامه درسی تربیت معلم باید استعداد تربیت عناصر حرفه‌‌ای با ویژگی‌های یادگیرندگی، پژوهندگی و توان مشاركت در صحنه خلق دانش حرفه‌‌ای یا همان تربیت معلم فكور را داشته باشد. این برنامه درسی باید به گونه‌ای فازبندی شده باشد كه به سهم خود اجازه جذب بهترین‌ها به این حرفه حساس و خطیر را بدهد. این اتفاق مستلزم آن است كه، اولا، برنامه فرصت تشخیص بهترین ها از میان جامعه داوطلبان ورود به حرفه معلمی را از نظام آموزشی به طور سیستماتیك سلب ننماید و ثانیا، جامعه داوطلبان از متقاضیانی تشكیل شده باشد كه با آگاهی و درایت اطمینان بخشی قصد ورود به این حرفه را كرده باشند.[۲]

دانشگاه فرهنگیان[ویرایش]

دانشگاه فرهنگیان وظیفه تأمین، تربیت و بهسازی معلمان و نیروی انسانی وزارت آموزش و پرورش را در ایران بر عهده دارد. این دانشگاه در سال ۱۳۹۰ با تجمیع کلیه مراکز تربیت معلم سراسر ایران تأسیس شد[۱] و دارای حدود ۹۸ واحد دانشگاهی (در قالب ۶۴ پردیس و ۳۴ مرکز وابسته به پردیس) و حدود ۶۵ هزار دانشجو می‌باشد. دانشگاه فرهنگیان از بزرگترین و گسترده‌ترین دانشگاههای ایران است و محمود مهرمحمدی سرپرستی آن را بر عهده دارد.

جستارهای وابسته[ویرایش]

منابع[ویرایش]

  1. ۱٫۰ ۱٫۱ ۱٫۲ «معرفی دانشگاه». وب‌گاه رسمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان. بازبینی‌شده در ۱۴ آوریل ۲۰۱۳. 
  2. محمود مهرمحمدی، برنامه ‌درسی تربیت معلم و الگوی اجرائی مشارکتی آن؛ راهبرد تحولی برای تربیت معلم در ایران، دوفصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی: نظریه و عمل، سال اول، شماره 1، تابستان 1392، 24-1

Teacher education refers to the policies, procedures and provision designed to equip (prospective) teachers with the knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and skills they require to perform their tasks effectively in the classroom, school and wider community. Those professionals who engage in this activity are called Teacher educators (or, in some contexts, teacher trainers).

Teacher education policy

The process by which teachers are educated is the subject of political discussion in many countries, reflecting both the value attached by societies and cultures to the preparation of young people for life, and the fact that education systems consume significant financial resources.

However, the degree of political control over Teacher Education varies. Where TE is entirely in the hands of universities, the state may have no direct control whatever over what or how new teachers are taught; this can lead to anomalies, such as teachers being taught using teaching methods that would be deemed inappropriate if they used the same methods in schools, or teachers being taught by persons with little or no hands-on experience of teaching in real classrooms. In other systems, TE may be the subject of detailed prescription (e.g. the state may specify the skills that all teachers must possess, or it may specify the content of TE courses).

Policy cooperation in the European Union has led to a broad description of the kinds of attributes that teachers in EU Member States should possess: the Common European Principle for Teacher Competences and Qualifications.[1]

The continuum of teacher education

Although ideally it should be conceived of, and organised as, a seamless continuum, teacher education is often divided into these stages

  • initial teacher training / education (a pre-service course before entering the classroom as a fully responsible teacher);
  • induction (the process of providing training and support during the first few years of teaching or the first year in a particular school);
  • teacher development or continuing professional development (CPD) (an in-service process for practicing teachers).

There is a longstanding and ongoing debate about the most appropriate term to describe these activities. The term 'teacher training' (which may give the impression that the activity involves training staff to undertake relatively routine tasks) seems to be losing ground, at least in the U.S., to 'teacher education' (with its connotation of preparing staff for a professional role as a reflective practitioner).[2]

Initial teacher education

Organization

In many countries, Initial Teacher Education (also known as preservice teacher training) takes place largely or exclusively in institutions of Higher Education. It may be organized according to two basic models.

In the 'consecutive' model, a teacher first obtains a qualification in one or more subjects (often an undergraduate bachelor's degree), and then studies for a further period to gain an additional qualification in teaching (this may take the form of a post-baccalaureate credential or master's degree).

In the alternative 'concurrent' model, a student simultaneously studies both one or more academic subjects, and the ways of teaching that subject, leading to a combined bachelor's degree and teaching credential to qualify as a teacher of that subject.

Other pathways are also available. In some countries, it is possible for a person to receive training as a teacher by working in a school under the responsibility of an accredited experienced practitioner. In the United Kingdom there is a long tradition of partnerships between universities and schools in providing state supported teacher education.[3] This tradition is not without tensions and controversies.[4]

In the United States, approximately one-third of new teachers come through alternative routes to teacher certification, according to testimony given by Emily Feistritzer, the President of National Center for Alternative Certification and the National Center for Education Information, to a congressional subcommittee on May 17, 2007. However, many alternative pathways are affiliated with schools of education, where candidates still enroll in university-based coursework. A supplemental component of university-based coursework is community-based teacher education, where teacher candidates immerse themselves in communities that will allow them to apply teaching theory to practice. Community-based teacher education also challenges teacher candidates' assumptions about the issues of gender, race, and multicultural diversity.[5]

Curriculum

The question of what knowledge, attitudes, behaviours and skills teachers should possess is the subject of much debate in many cultures. This is understandable, as teachers are entrusted with the transmission to learners of society's beliefs, attitudes and deontology, as well as of information, advice and wisdom, and with facilitating learners' acquisition of the key knowledge, attitudes and behaviours that they will need to be active in society and the economy.

Generally, Teacher Education curricula can be broken down into four major areas:

  • foundational knowledge in education-related aspects of philosophy of education, history of education, educational psychology, and sociology of education.
  • skills in assessing student learning, supporting English Language learners,[dubious ] using technology to improve teaching and learning, and supporting students with special needs.
  • content-area and methods knowledge and skills—often also including ways of teaching and assessing a specific subject, in which case this area may overlap with the first ("foundational") area. There is increasing debate about this aspect; because it is no longer possible to know in advance what kinds of knowledge and skill pupils will need when they enter adult life, it becomes harder to know what kinds of knowledge and skill teachers should have. Increasingly, emphasis is placed upon 'transversal' or 'horizontal' skills (such as 'learning to learn' or 'social competences'), which cut across traditional subject boundaries, and therefore call into question traditional ways of designing the Teacher Education curriculum (and traditional school curricula and ways of working in the classroom).
  • practice at classroom teaching or at some other form of educational practice—usually supervised and supported in some way, though not always. Practice can take the form of field observations, student teaching, or (U.S.) internship (See Supervised Field Experiences below).

Supervised field experiences

  • field observations—include observation and limited participation within a classroom under the supervision of the classroom teacher
  • student teaching—includes a number of weeks teaching in an assigned classroom under the supervision of the classroom teacher and a supervisor (e.g. from the university)
  • internship—teaching candidate is supervised within his or her own classroom

These three areas reflect the organization of most teacher education programs in North America (though not necessarily elsewhere in the world)—courses, modules, and other activities are often organized to belong to one of the three major areas of teacher education. The organization makes the programs more rational or logical in structure. The conventional organization has sometimes also been criticized, however, as artificial and unrepresentative of how teachers actually experience their work. Problems of practice frequently (perhaps usually) concern foundational issues, curriculum, and practical knowledge simultaneously, and separating them during teacher education may therefore not be helpful. However, the question of necessary training components is highly debated as continuing increases in attrition rates by new teachers and struggling learners is evident.[6] Additionally, with the increasing demands of the "teacher" research is beginning to suggest that teachers must not only be trained to increase learning experiences for their students, but how to also be a leader in an increasingly challenging field.[7] The debate of how best to prepare teachers for teaching in today's demanding environments will continue to be an important focus of the United States, where the education of all children successfully is priority.

Induction of beginning teachers

Teaching involves the use of a wide body of knowledge about the subject being taught, and another set of knowledge about the most effective ways to teach that subject to different kinds of learner; it, therefore, requires teachers to undertake a complex set of tasks every minute. Many teachers experience their first years in the profession as stressful. The proportion of teachers who either do not enter the profession after completing initial training, or who leave the profession after their first teaching post, is high.[8]

A distinction is sometimes made between inducting a teacher into a new school (explaining the school's vision, procedures etc.), and inducting a new teacher into the teaching profession (providing the support necessary to help the beginning teacher develop a professional identity, and to further develop the basic competences that were acquired in college).

A number of countries and states have put in place comprehensive systems of support to help beginning teachers during their first years in the profession. Elements of such a programme can include:

  • mentoring: the allocation to each beginning teacher of an experienced teacher, specifically trained as a mentor; the mentor may provide emotional and professional support and guidance; in many U.S. states, induction is limited to the provision of a mentor, but research suggests that, in itself, it is not enough.[9]
  • a peer network: for mutual support but also for peer learning.
  • input from educational experts (e.g. to help the beginning teacher relate what she learned in college with classroom reality).
  • support for the process of self-reflection that all teachers engage in (e.g. through the keeping of a journal).

Some research[10] suggests that such programmes can: increase the retention of beginning teachers in the profession; improve teaching performance; promote the teachers' personal and professional well-being.[11]

However, numerous authors [12][13] suggest that current teacher education is highly flawed and primarily geared towards a western dominated curriculum.[14] Hence, they suggest that teacher education should be inclusive and take into account multiple backgrounds and variables to allow teachers to be responsive to the requirements of their students.[12] This falls into the area of culturally responsive teaching and requires teaching education and teachers to address issues of diversity education and disadvantage as a part of a teacher education curriculum. Jabbar & Hardaker (2013) [15] argue that this is an essential process in helping students of ethnicity, colour and diversity achieve and attain.

Continuous professional development

Because the world that teachers are preparing young people to enter is changing so rapidly, and because the teaching skills required are evolving likewise, no initial course of teacher education can be sufficient to prepare a teacher for a career of 30 or 40 years. In addition, as the student body continues to change due to demographic issues there is a continuous pressure on academics to have mastery of their subjects but also to understand their students.[16][17] Continuous Professional Development (CPD) is the process by which teachers (like other professionals) reflect upon their competencies, keep them up to date, and develop them further.

The extent to which education authorities support this process varies, as does the effectiveness of the different approaches. A growing research base suggests that to be most effective, CPD activities should:

  • be spread over time,
  • be collaborative,
  • use active learning,
  • be delivered to groups of teachers,
  • include periods of practice, coaching, and follow-up,
  • promote reflective practice,[18]
  • encourage experimentation, and
  • respond to teachers' needs.[19][20][21]

Quality assurance in teacher education

The concept of 'Quality' in education is contested and understood in numerous different ways.

It is sometimes taken to relate to the quality of the work undertaken by a teacher, which has significant effects upon his or her pupils or students. Further, those who pay teachers' salaries, whether through taxes or through school fees, wish to be assured that they are receiving value for money. Ways to measure the quality of work of individual teachers, of schools, or of education systems as a whole, are therefore often sought.

In most countries, teacher salary is not related to the perceived quality of his or her work. Some, however, have systems to identify the 'best-performing' teachers, and increase their remuneration accordingly. Elsewhere, assessments of teacher performance may be undertaken with a view to identifying teachers' needs for additional training or development, or, in extreme cases, to identify those teachers that should be required to leave the profession. In some countries, teachers are required to re-apply periodically for their license to teach, and in so doing, to prove that they still have the requisite skills.

Feedback on the performance of teachers is integral to many state and private education procedures, but takes many different forms. The 'no fault' approach is believed by some to be satisfactory, as weaknesses are carefully identified, assessed and then addressed through the provision of in house or school based training. These can, however, be seen as benefiting the institution and not necessarily fully meeting the CPD needs of the individual as they lack educational gravitas.

Teacher educators

Teacher Educator
Occupation
Names Teacher Educator, teacher trainer
Occupation type
Profession
Activity sectors
Education
Description
Competencies Teaching, teaching about teaching, research into learning and teaching,
Education required
varies
Related jobs
Professor, academic, lecturer, tutor, teacher

A teacher educator (also called a teacher trainer) is a person who helps other people to acquire the knowledge, competences and attitudes they require to be effective teachers. Several individual teacher educators are usually involved in the initial or ongoing education of each teacher; often each specialises in teaching about a different aspect of teaching (e.g. educational ethics, philosophy of education, sociology of education, curriculum, pedagogy, subject-specific teaching methods etc.).

Not every culture has a concept that precisely matches the English term 'teacher educator'...[22] Even where the concept exists, the range of roles that is covered by the term varies significantly from country to country.[23] In some traditions, the term 'teacher trainer' may be used instead of 'teacher educator'.

A teacher educator may be narrowly defined as a higher education professional whose principle activity is the preparation of beginning teachers in universities and other institutions of teacher education, such as teacher colleges. A broader definition might include any professional whose work contributes in some way to the initial education or the continuing professional development of school and other teachers.[22]

Even within a single educational system, teacher educators may be employed in different roles by different kinds of organisation. In the European context, for example, people who could be considered to be teacher educators include:

-Higher Education academics with a responsibility
--for Teacher Education as such,
--for teaching a subject (such as chemistry or mathematics) to students who will later become teachers;
--for research into teaching,
--for subject studies or
--for didactics;
-teachers in schools who supervise student teachers during periods of teaching practice;
-school teachers or school managers responsible for inducting new teachers during their first year of teaching; or
-those in charge of school teaching staff’s continuous professional development.[24]

Teacher educators may therefore work in many different contexts including (universities, schools, private sector training organisations or trade unions)[24] and their working time may be fully, or only partly, dedicated to the preparation of teachers.

Professional knowledge and competences of teacher educators

Being able to educate teachers requires different knowledge and skills than those required to teach pupils or students.[25]

Teacher educators' fields of knowledge

Some recent research has highlighted the many fields of knowledge that are required by teacher educators; these include knowledge about: the pedagogy of teacher education; learning and learners; teaching and coaching; and the profession of teacher educator itself. In addition, teacher educators need to know about the specific contexts their students will work in (e.g. for primary, or secondary education) and the subjects they will teach. More experienced teacher educators need expertise in: curriculum development and assessment; the wider context of teacher education, the way it is organised, and in research.[26]

Multiple Identities

The complexity of the tasks of the teacher educator arises in part because, as research has shown, they have multiple professional identities. (This is linked to the issues of definition of the term, highlighted above). While some of those who carry responsibility for the education of teachers do self-identify as 'teacher educator', others may self-identify rather as 'researcher' or 'academic'; others may relate primarily to their academic discipline, such as 'chemist' or 'geographer'[27]

But the key duality of identity that lies at the core of the teacher educator profession is that of first-order and second order teaching. A teacher educator must be a highly competent ‘first-order educator’ (i.e. a good teacher) but also a skilled ‘second-order educator’ (i.e. capable of teaching effectively about the skill of teaching and facilitating others to acquire teaching skills). As first-order educators, they need to be proficient teachers (of 'adult' students). As second-order educators, they require, in addition, specific competences and dispositions, such as modelling and meta-reflection, that enable them to teach about teaching.[25]

Modelling

The way in which teacher educators teach has a greater impact on student teachers’ thinking about practice than what teacher educators teach.[28] So, teacher educators need to be able to model the competences and attributes they wish their students to adopt.[29] Swennen et al (2008).[30] concluded that, in order to ‘model’ what they teach, teacher educators need to develop the ability to link their own (tacit) theories and practice of teaching to public theory, i.e., in Korthagen’s [31] words, to translate Theory with a capital ‘T’ to theory with a small ‘t’.

Meta-reflection

Just as teaching is no longer seen as simply transferring factual information, so educating teachers also requires a more sophisticated approach, based upon professional awareness[32] that comes from reflective practice.[33] For Loughran,[34] being a professional teacher educator requires “genuinely reflecting on, and responding to, the needs, demands, and expectations of teaching about teaching within the academy”.

Professional standards for teacher educators

In some parts of the world (notably the USA, the Netherlands, and Flanders) specific standards of professional practice have been developed for, or by, teacher educators. These set out the range of competences that a member of the teacher educator profession is expected to be able to deploy, as well as the attitudes, values and behaviours that are deemed to be acceptable for membership of the profession.)[35]

Professional organisations of teacher educators

Professional associations of people involved in educating teachers exist in many parts of the world and include:

ATE - the Association of Teacher Educators [2] (USA),
ATEA - the Australian Teacher Education Association [3]
ATEE - the Association for Teacher Education in Europe [4]
VELON - Vereniging Lerarenopleiders Nederland [5] (The Netherlands)
VELOV - Vereniging Lerarenopleiders Vlaanderen [6] (Flanders, the Flemish-speaking community of Belgium)

There is also a

WFATE - World Federation of Associations of Teacher Education [7]

Policy and legislation on the teacher educator profession

While schools and school teachers are often in the news and in political debate, research shows that the teacher educator profession is largely absent from such public discussions and from policy discourse in Education [36] which often focuses exclusively on teachers and school leaders.

Some research suggests that, while most countries have policies, and legislation, in place concerning the teaching profession, few countries have a clear policy or strategy on the teacher educator profession. Caena (2012) [37] found that some of the consequences of this situation can include a teacher educator profession that is poorly organised, has low status or low formal recognition, has few regulations, professional standards - or even minimum qualifications, and no coherent approach to the selection, induction, or continuing professional development of Teacher Educators.

Research into the teacher educator profession

The teacher educator profession has also been seen as under-researched;[38] empirical research on professional practice is also scarce.[39]

However, the importance of the quality of this profession for the quality of teaching and learning has been underlined by international bodies including the OECD and the European Commission [40]

Some writers have therefore identified a need for more research into “what teachers of teachers themselves need to know”, and what institutional supports are needed to “meet the complex demands of preparing teachers for the 21st century”[41]

In response to this perceived need, more research projects are now focussing on the teacher educator profession.[42] Several academic journals cover this field.

See also

References

  1. ^ http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/principles_en.pdf
  2. ^ see for example Cecil H. Allen, In-Service Training of Teachers in Review of Educational Research. 1940; 10: 210–215. In the UK, however, the term 'teacher training' is still in general use: see for instance the UK government's information on tda.gov.uk
  3. ^ BERA/RSA (2014). RESEARCH AND THE TEACHING PROFESSION. Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. London: BERA. ISBN 978-0-946671-37-3. 
  4. ^ Oancea, Alis (2014). "Teachers' professional knowledge and state-funded teacher education: a (hi)story of critiques and silences". Oxford Review of Education. 40: 497–519. 
  5. ^ U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor website. Accessed on December 7, 2009.
  6. ^ Rosser-Cox, Michelle (2011). CULTURAL RESPONSIVENESS AND MOTIVATION IN PREPARING TEACHERS: PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS: DOES CULTURAL RESPONSIVENESS AFFECT ANTICIPATED SELF-DETERMINATION TO TEACH IN SPECIFIC SETTINGS?. LAMBERT Academic Publishing. p. 172. ISBN 3844384693. 
  7. ^ Rosser and Massey (2013). Educational Leadership: The Power of Oneself. Peter Lang. 
  8. ^ Richard, Ingersoll,; M, Smith, Thomas (1 January 2004). "Do Teacher Induction and Mentoring Matter?". 
  9. ^ Wong H; Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving; NASSP Bulletin � Vol. 88 No. 638 March 2004
  10. ^ Ashby, P., Hobson, A., Tracey, L., Malderez, A., Tomlinson, P., Roper, T., Chambers, G. and Healy, J. (2008). Beginner teachers' experiences of initial teacher preparation, induction and early professional development: a review of literature. London: DCSF
  11. ^ Huling-Austin, J. A synthesis of research on teacher induction programs and practices; paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans LA, April 5–9, 1988
  12. ^ a b Villegas, A.; Lucas, T. (2002). "Preparing culturally responsive teachers rethinking the curriculum". Journal of Teacher Education. 53 (1): 20–32. doi:10.1177/0022487102053001003. 
  13. ^ Jabbar, Abdul and Hardaker, Glenn (2013) The role of culturally responsive teaching for supporting ethnic diversity in British University Business Schools. Teaching in Higher Education , 18 (3). pp. 272-284.
  14. ^ Turner, Y (2006). "Chinese Students in a UK Business School: Hearing the Student Voice in Reflective Teaching and Learning Practice". Higher Education Quarterly. 60 (1): 27–51. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2006.00306.x. 
  15. ^ Jabbar, Abdul; Hardaker, Glenn (2013). "The role of culturally responsive teaching for supporting ethnic diversity in British University Business Schools". Teaching in Higher Education. 18 (3): 272–284. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.725221. 
  16. ^ Howard, T. C. (2003). "Culturally Relevant Pedagogy: Ingredients for Critical Teacher Reflection". Theory into Practice. 42 (3): 195–202. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4203_5. 
  17. ^ Jabbar, Abdul; Hardaker, Glenn (2013). "The role of culturally responsive teaching for supporting ethnic diversity in British University Business Schools". Teaching in Higher Education. 18 (3): 272–284. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.725221. 
  18. ^ "Theatre of the Oppressed in Education - Centre for Community Dialogue and Change". 
  19. ^ see: Snow-Renner and Lauer, ‘Professional Development Analysis (synthesis of 54 studies), McREL, 2005
  20. ^ Garet, See; Porter, Desmoine; Birman, Kwang (2001). "What makes professional development effective?". American Education Research Journal. 38 (4): 915–946. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915. 
  21. ^ see General Teaching Council for England, 'Teachers' Professional Learning', London, 2005.
  22. ^ a b Francesca Caena: Perspectives on Teacher Educator policies in European countries: an overview. Retrieved January 2017 at http://www.lerarenopleider.nl/velon/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/summary_national_situations_teacher_educator_policies_europe.pdf
  23. ^ see, for example, the analysis of how this term is used within Europe in: European Commission (2012), 'Supporting the Teaching Professions for Better Learning Outcomes' retrieved January 2017 at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0374:FIN:EN:PDF
  24. ^ a b these examples are taken from the European Commission's text 'Supporting teacher educators' retrieved January 2017 from [1]
  25. ^ a b Murray, J., Male, T. (2005) ‘Becoming a teacher educator: evidence from the field’ Teaching and Teacher Education 21 125–142[000]
  26. ^ These are taken from: Dengerink J, Lunenberg M and Kools Q (2015) ‘What and how teacher educators prefer to learn’, Journal of Education for Teaching, 41:1, 78-96; but see also a similar list of required competences in European Commission (2012), 'Supporting the Teaching Professions for Better Learning Outcomes' retrieved January 2017 at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0374:FIN:EN:PDF
  27. ^ see, for example: Swennen A., Jones K, Volman M (2010). ‘Teacher Educators: their identities, sub-identities and implications for professional development’, Professional Development in Education, 36 (1-2), March- June 2010, 131-148.
  28. ^ Russell, 1997 cited in Loughran J. and Berry A.: ‘Modelling by teacher educators’, Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (2005) 193–203
  29. ^ Loughran and Berry 2005; Lunenberg M., Korthagen F. and Swennen A. (2007): ‘The teacher educator as a role model’, Teaching and Teacher Education 23 586–601; Davey, R. and Ham, V. (2011), ‘ ‘It’s all about paying attention!’ … but to what?’ in Bates et al.: ‘The Professional Development of teacher educators’, Routledge, London, 2011; pp 232-247
  30. ^ Swennen, A., Lunenberg, M. and Korthagen, F. (2008): ‘Preach what you teach! Teacher educators and congruent teaching’, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 14(5), 531–542
  31. ^ Korthagen FAJ, (2001), ‘Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education’. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
  32. ^ see, for example: Yaffe E. and Maskit D, ‘Discussing pedagogical dilemmas with teacher educators …’ In Bates et al 'The Professional Development of teacher educators', Routledge, London, 2011
  33. ^ see for example Ken Zeichner 'Becoming a teacher educator: a personal perspective;'Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (2005) 117–124
  34. ^ Loughran J (2014) ‘Professionally Developing as a Teacher Educator’; Journal of Teacher Education 2014, Vol. 65(4) 271–283(2014)
  35. ^ See examples from USA: http://www.ate1.org/pubs/uploads/tchredstds0308.pdf and the Netherlands: http://www.lerarenopleider.nl/velon/beroepsstandaard/
  36. ^ Snoek, Swennen, vanderKlink (2009). "The teacher educator: A Neglected Factor in the Contemporary Debate on Teacher Education,". Advancing quality cultures for teacher education in Europe: tensions and opportunities. Umea University.: 288–299. 
  37. ^ Caena F (2012) ‘Perspectives on Teacher Educator policies in European countries: an overview’ paper prepared for the European Commission conference ‘Education²: Policy support for Teacher Educators’; downloaded August 2013 at http://ec.europa.eu/education/school-education/teacher-educator_en.htm
  38. ^ Murray J, Male T (2005). "Becoming a teacher educator: evidence from the field". Teaching and Teacher Education. 21: 125–142. 
  39. ^ Willemse M, Lunenberg M, Korthagen F (2005). "‘Values in education: a challenge for teacher educators’". Teaching and Teacher Education. 21: 205–217. 
  40. ^ see, for example: European Commission (2012), 'Supporting the Teaching Professions for Better Learning Outcomes' retrieved January 2017 at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0374:FIN:EN:PDF
  41. ^ Cochran-Smith M (2003): ‘Learning and unlearning: the education of teacher educators’, Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (2003) 5–28)
  42. ^ For one example, see the InfoTED project at https://www.ntnu.edu/info-ted

Further reading